From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:3141::101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EC1A21F182 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 07:30:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 752A01B405; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:30:48 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1395066650; bh=MGRfgDmqaa+5TsVuUJPToKbKpIDn9mkmCnJLeIaSOQc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ohMvwvefY4Oyi3oaTwrlKztbOVXxoGgwsyspRVBpzHLq/vYYDwFjWMIjS1gGQBVcB oVOzLwbxJl98ic4Hg4W7+pY8Tzr7O5pYGB9jwflZPtvHxEOlfFijBsU8RJRjU0Bg5K uyqaijBi/gIoKyZ700Rt75hEwZLGkoozCcYeXUKk= From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Dave Taht References: <5162.1395058842@sandelman.ca> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:30:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Dave Taht's message of "Mon, 17 Mar 2014 06:40:01 -0700") Message-ID: <87eh20lwx5.fsf@toke.dk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.32-9 released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:30:58 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Dave Taht writes: > At least one blueray player we know of isn't working through the > default dhcp/dns/upnp setup. Why would a bluray player need upnp? *shudder* > I've modeled something that basically should work in my bcp38 repo. So, not sure exactly how it's supposed to work; does this hook into the firewall after NAT'ing has been applied? Otherwise you'd presumably need to add exceptions for the configured internal network(s)? (I think that may be what is going on in the bcp script at ln 38, but some sort of auto-detection of the relevant network(s) would be needed? Or as a minimum a whitelist configuration option?) Could double-nat be detected from wan iface hotplug or somesuch? > That said, surviving an ipv6 renumber is a problem. Many clients > probably don't respect an address assignment lifetime. Application-transparent MPTCP from the operating system with automatic failover? Pretty please? :) -Toke --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTJwcWAAoJEENeEGz1+utPu7oH/00IYoAr5k2S2Uxfrb8ISyBP 9JamCDiXoNxRVlY67K5w4LefTqE9mtTAnsUoeiej55G65hJHojCCDCUoD4CxSxXa mD4GTKpsxgXJsHLTz4HiVscyeHYpDG4bwEojEVjfsyIcZmttGeuwZJdQSCl8NTxb u5UZj1fEvKTgZGpiB//qfmA7qRdQZaQYKvNEVZBP8+uO6p+JZ7M6rDcfcjT1XjW2 0KYpRynLdY2W1vLDD8SS3B+OD0wdje/qZTRFGl3nwUgvXv6BfYaVYPqFeM0oJ1B5 ylaMnNBH+Qc+zb8Ko3/3SipuN92oookET7lfh7JE3xNEWzV6PkMvSo5TT5dNvhY= =wjHW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--