From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D944321FA50 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 04:09:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1442488149; bh=iTHhaHZUNvJ9K0CI5Jn1fR2eapc7U7ZZcLyOQxHbgeg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=cETBE8CostzPRzAdud3shZDhkrtXhvaR23lZBycINpf2wv3JHtLYp4QUWeQUeu7rL 0BIrANB9r+fhTBN+2Wy0nWJmZuKlDZ3eHEBdYHGeI0VPWH/lJKd7JAXHcbjYIRYJD7 v2JvbkJELMXhZfRLWu00sJKSqiouTQGotthur/fg= Sender: toke@toke.dk Received: by alrua-kau.kau.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 33E4AC402B8; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:09:08 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Rich Brown References: Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:09:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Rich Brown's message of "Thu, 17 Sep 2015 07:04:52 -0400") X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87fv2dz4iz.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] OpenWrt Chaos Calmer vs SQM X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:09:36 -0000 Rich Brown writes: > I saw a complaint on the OpenWrt forums that complain that they're > having trouble with SQM in the new (final) Chaos Calmer build. Looks like a package dependency problem, i.e. trying to install the package into a different version than it was built for. Seems the final version is working fine for him, so I'd say no worries? :) -Toke