From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:3141::101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1184021F0D3 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 13:51:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E36DE1CA72; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 22:51:29 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1396212690; bh=BI+3Va3e3AJGPU3hn747vouLYFJbSffCHpeRyqn3LT8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=qbTx6ulRia1uyH23y7x5iQ5hPzZbvs8PJl4lgsxqsr1sZ+7wIKwr6H2gWY8rgk8v7 gVPbssn8rtBW6pWcMZkbeIkFb2/Bps+Oq3KbDi70iuCvxSRMcaq8pAVvGB1Is2IZur blZ2mFOhVoZryaKVONi6vixdq4ft8PpG1Ix35Bfk= From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Dave Taht References: <532DD9DD.8040301@thekelleys.org.uk> <871txut453.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> <532DE7A8.3010504@thekelleys.org.uk> <87ppleroks.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> <53348C32.4040907@thekelleys.org.uk> <87ha6idabz.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> <53353C07.9030000@thekelleys.org.uk> <87eh1madfy.fsf@toke.dk> <533551F6.9010402@thekelleys.org.uk> <87lhvu8uqi.fsf@toke.dk> <5335E1BD.7010304@thekelleys.org.uk> <87k3bdbbt6.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> <87bnwpb7f7.fsf_-_@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> <421.1396128076@sandelman.ca> <877g7bbz5g.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> <87ppl3a3if.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 22:51:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Dave Taht's message of "Sun, 30 Mar 2014 13:06:29 -0700") Message-ID: <87ioqv9zqr.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] DNSSEC & NTP Bootstrapping -- prototype! X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 20:51:38 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Dave Taht writes: > Only thing I can think of that makes some sense at the moment is doing > a stubby resolver in ntp itself. Right. Next time I feel like writing one of those I'll give it a shot... :P > There isn't. Arguably there should have been a flag added to > getaddrinfo ages ago... I was going to add one; however, it seems it's not entirely straight forward to propagate it through the C library so the code that produces DNS packets can actually act on it... > Please push the script into the cerowrt repo for further testing. Pushed :) -Toke --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTOIPMAAoJEENeEGz1+utPwh4H+wYG4TlTj0vIBYiIquDH8bW9 7EJ5o7IwnVnynvQrvAn0dALbkTJVfXxiuTnUVrrtzciXfgw+FdikRg3fLlrd8LEF NvHImAngzGEl2mtEsLTq3bcKbiXLU7xr9HjnpTqAHS68Wx3CfBXFyHOVQ9uhgzHb SB9h0l5xjS7RHCrS8Lmle5sEuSCLxApFFtAE9Q3wpTHQE1AeTZ8MIpZqBtFXehW9 LGeJa6BXHdZyqy5CKJR3joRTjDItbUb95TrssuCArqf5GpSewcxdY4uy33LVCebz g1vy7gzDzDBQqIhBj8QdVsfFjvcMi+q24AeJ3jIPgUPkunDM+WC/r5tQHQNilxY= =y18z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--