From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:3141::101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 533EB21F206 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 06:39:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F2A631C2C5; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:39:31 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1395668372; bh=ciTU5XQtAnCk1oIYfvFZREhK8zSTnQRcJsY4EwA/07Y=; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=g7u+dm/Zlc6QOmnlKvHjtuNzRHnzp+pvf+EfYjfchIa78/H1L/LiMPGuTWtab1JY1 vN7jcmqOLJhudtzpcWX5Y5gIi8CGyJApA9IN27SeGWI2dTEuXqvohlNs72svMp0d9Q yo7AI6phzK8AK/wzjZKiwcl8GDcMelaTD6Z9JwIc= From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <8738i9rwrx.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> <12727.1395614516@sandelman.ca> <87txanj4sz.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> <20140324122915.GP7867@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:39:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20140324122915.GP7867@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> (Chuck Anderson's message of "Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:29:16 -0400") Message-ID: <87ior3iulp.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] DNSSEC & NTP Bootstrapping X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:39:40 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Chuck Anderson writes: > How about writing an RFC to define a well-known NTP anycast address > and using that as a fallback? This is a problem that needs to be > solved for the larger internet community, not just CeroWRT/OpenWRT. This would probably be a nice long-term solution (though I'd be worried about the DOS potential of such a setup?); we would probably need a short-term solution in the intervening years until everyone implements this, though... ;) -Toke --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTMDWSAAoJEENeEGz1+utPwroH/jJU9URbUxBHgfiXXvlLeThC 4kdSHOYlBJjGRkKPVHtZRT2pcHhbZjiP0mZzZRvOy+SuAveug8+lAMWqvnQAYDFf CbMjIx1cIWJW3XQB2t9mzna0KMvI+AA4T4YTDAc+wchyJwrmXtanJ9G0IHKP8yNc 0uSuVM09uFYNIklbolN3DjS0wxk1yS3PNfliwT1xgBKJ+RsHXJ9x4yViM1kH7plt ybCER6WR2YyR4uvrmQXHhuZD/w32X83KxJ0xhEekkQ5JeVX7ORHGrOlifto5VHOv 6DoW5j7FXeGkoYqpKqhGRgIrE+HleYIY+rEU7jy1yWk7j/y4ACJ3H3QLFZbdhlI= =OQ6F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--