From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:3141::101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D39D21F24B for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:26:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 627D41BD20; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 00:26:42 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1395444403; bh=D1jI8PRLHWqVg/ZZBA1gTAszPnplY8hsCGYOpbx/j4s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=sp5aJybO1IgP4nOmapTbPfiq25n10RBd0pN2PlaNwLQo1JaLFk1E6PYt/zzLCJIGe C684W/ur2ns9aMKzK3C/Pqst6HW+p/XlKWLWvMhXz2qDAjy8op+VKGnZVVrCxWsItY QCvE340wv4oSNDQEA9FMAKJ9t+wxao1fJtus2C10= From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Sebastian Moeller References: <3F98D180-3AF8-4AFA-80B4-A13E55CAA03A@gmx.de> <87mwgjtb8z.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> <7F1EA8E6-0C2E-471D-A24F-8D08A10998FC@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 00:26:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <7F1EA8E6-0C2E-471D-A24F-8D08A10998FC@gmx.de> (Sebastian Moeller's message of "Sat, 22 Mar 2014 00:04:58 +0100") Message-ID: <87ior7t9ov.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.32-12 released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 23:26:54 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Sebastian Moeller writes: > It just seems to work, and well at that. Wow, great! I expected it to break in horrible ways I had not thought of... Thanks for testing! :) > I guess I should have been clearer in my comment; what I wanted to say > is that it is great that you actually offer this ;). Ah, I see :) > (Tiny note: if there is only one member in the white-list the GUI only > shows the add button and no delete button, just deleting the contents > does work though) Yeah, that seems to be an idiosyncrasy of the luci gui that I'm declaring it firmly out of scope for this to fix. ;) A general fix might be useful, though. Should probably be fixed in the Luci javascript (/www/luci-static/resources/cbi.js on the router) -- not really sure what the right behaviour is, though...? -Toke --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTLMqwAAoJEENeEGz1+utPn64IAJ0ULC9vvEq6Y0Qk0eYG+Gh8 h8T9iVDsyjNgjzU95m+oJiUu7GKtOpvP8kwdcNKwQyEHL95NN7flf0s63Kb58gS+ 1lcilbHphEYVurCi6pu7K9zaLRTuFyUg0bHYPeU68WZ4w23C06IiM0bgW6I48ICB qxKyD4I/hFIHpQecDkr+Oqgt9U3+azXdolV3+gg4zlYjO7ugnbAdUsKpIKBQ0qAE ryLj6VsiXR2WxxKdDvfL8fpVIvhS/qb6EDVs1Is/NLlpWulfleB0bL3yD7IkRNTd GVv3Pd+LqFHhcTkzfBL7uizj//vJH2QJfbfQwDM4L39wB94aFzK9Qkx7OMpM45I= =Vmp9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--