From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.tohojo.dk (mail.tohojo.dk [188.40.53.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 000F6200BD0 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 14:04:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alrua-desktop.borgediget.toke.dk (unknown [10.42.3.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tohojo.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DC831EC0D49; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 23:04:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alrua-desktop.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ADA4E16240; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 23:04:30 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Sebastian Moeller References: <0C8722D2-EC97-4816-9935-D7FC112C6E52@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 23:04:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <0C8722D2-EC97-4816-9935-D7FC112C6E52@gmx.de> (Sebastian Moeller's message of "Sun, 11 Aug 2013 22:22:58 +0200") Message-ID: <87iozc5483.fsf@toke.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] AQM scripts modified for DSL exploration X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 21:04:35 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sebastian Moeller writes: > I would love if this functionality, if not the implementation, would > end up in the next version of the AQM scripts=E2=80=A6 Hi Sebastian Thanks for the modifications; I'm pretty swamped for the rest of August, so won't have time to test out your modifications until sometime in September (although Dave may have). I'll try to look at it then, but my backlog will probably be longish, so no idea when I'll get around to it. If you come up with more improvements in the meantime, feel free to post those. Also, any chance you could post your changes as a git-compatible diff against the repo at https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.3 (the relevant packages are luci/luci-app-aqm and net/aqm-scripts)? :) =2DToke --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSB/xcAAoJEENeEGz1+utPIOgIAKNF3uGaX/ERmbR66tfh0cw5 YsmX0MhFN5Dqosaxi95jTIOmqCeJuGCUSQE6QSJWhpZO6bHnCI16Id/vHGlUMRws 69So618QUdSv2m2WuqFJoBi3b93IjDiet0x6AzXv+cjDxofDlm7b/zxHvCOPeHNl 5+pi/heXIyoa9GMANrJrX18Qw8sKQBsaAMs4BHQ6wE0dUIvh8fZ4zP42LXT3Vu0p 3ns5GvRn60b3L3tChjKb+qdPOstRsRRz3KbOUuh+8NZfX885t7c+EtJNpT65FQhH TI366xwQ/hvKuSoPJGxZijQ4E+6ugUppd2/XqlXVHxDoldq3o01E6vKz/+tOVnY= =uYmh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--