From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:3141::101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6287721F232 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:57:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 833341E57A; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 19:57:08 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1397152629; bh=PiDH7VIPBmqcqQse3PbhTxdmERnddcU3EF1wvnS3IY0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=vo1qUS/hF8x+k678wtuagf+GX1EqAcTPi6Y1kZ1iafB456BfilCmufgGn7sWi4Vaz kHDIkx9CvY9aucibbE0AlQC0yNv3OAWyCyVcUhxpnqZAqfLeU8mCAbYCr4cNftbGTJ 041k0mTBexKwPhchaplSIiawzuhYuGaYABsEfabA= From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Dave Taht References: <85984.1397137700@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <5346A561.30901@gmail.com> <87sipll0fh.fsf@toke.dk> <5346B650.5040200@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 19:57:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Dave Taht's message of "Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:29:30 -0700") Message-ID: <87k3axjcej.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> Content-Type: text/plain Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.36-4 released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:57:18 -0000 Dave Taht writes: > 4) I'd like to benchmark the impact of the non-existence proofs... Haven't done any benchmarking, but I've noticed that the first time to resolve anything after a (complete) restart of dnsmasq is quite slow. As in on the order of a second slow. Might be my setup that is busted somehow, though... -Toke