From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:3141::101])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9ACA21F18E
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Sun, 16 Mar 2014 16:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
Received: by alrua-desktop.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 8ED7821306; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:48:01 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310;
	t=1395013682; bh=ubNQJeVYnGCRcAhtQHIVKInKtgF2JFMKSyNP5PQ8Op4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date;
	b=dFQs7l2PkbZzW0w6ixKr3vCzQKBOVcC9Hd5xAgpXDJpgEc7cgM5cj+UvNc56VVvXO
	zWOXaD2FpIJz+2q02x32jNBFzystQqeobw9xniINwlV64IQZRCPPxbB20tqc0eL+tl
	+IX6gj0Jy+itcMp3J+khsJrpDk2f6smngpqRKVac=
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:47:59 +0100
Message-ID: <87lhw9u2mo.fsf@toke.dk>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] miniupnpd vs natpmp
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 23:48:10 -0000

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

I seem to have ended up with both miniupnpd and natpmp installed;
miniupnpd claims to do natpmp, so is the other one needed?

-Toke

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTJjgvAAoJEENeEGz1+utPeBAH/3JWkTEyAjS6O0eyrqglrZB3
BD5g2nGtbZgT2kicwrVvoF4v4MKr/mQRddv7VdzCtFrtOX41+3QrSz+HipF7UDtA
K4p70L5/+6fOvX8zzWydqCvqBPX4HEk7A6ikHw04SNgI6W6fWC4ew9N2TYdvMZuy
4SOqAvoz5bkHQbSj9dMDN0K+fcED2Js6vDnROGNlWcK4VqMjwX1U3iw88mVZ6MnY
doFLbD8ZI87EYrSRDdfY47nl7RLT+FByRwQdlYoblDZ6lxI+bb+09j0DKRkrSxDh
vT9nSKl+S29MrbOJ2JZuYr/F/94ZRO61ScK7vYX2O1NFLRfF2wW3VjwGxiJIwP0=
=JYXk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--