From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [144.76.141.112])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF14921F35E;
	Fri, 12 Sep 2014 02:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk
Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id AEA172C7CB; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:44:50 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310;
	t=1410515091; bh=WYtzwMwO3SEZEA1Jd3AJ0m88Bt6kx+P5aXYTPVM8rpg=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=aC9I4auy4vlAbsLfxP7ljaT0d5xgXXyqRGut7hSdku1AV22yMesNs+/O/DHcVyXlj
	wE9eeyaDneUBXEL/ZbHUhLQN9i4aojVQFWKCBfmjYbSIEbsobPCdd52LKnsvVncAPc
	8Ysq24plmpjQ1a+yoOOKUDcXFJNxt/VnLxf+PkTc=
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw7Zy2vwLPcV0cb9O1jj2QU_h6Vj2fHok9fm-X7-ssnStA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:44:47 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7Zy2vwLPcV0cb9O1jj2QU_h6Vj2fHok9fm-X7-ssnStA@mail.gmail.com>
	(Dave Taht's message of "Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:03:05 -0700")
Message-ID: <87oaulxje8.fsf@toke.dk>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Cc: Wes Felter <wmf@felter.org>,
	Joel =?utf-8?Q?Wir=C4=81mu?= Pauling <joel@aenertia.net>,
	"cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fixing bufferbloat: How about an open letter to
	the web benchmarkers?
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 09:45:28 -0000

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:

> What if we could publish an open letter to the benchmark makers such
> as speedtest, explaining how engineering for their test does *not*
> make for a better internet? The press fallout from that letter, would
> improve some user education, regardless if we could get the tests
> changed or not.
>
> Who here would sign?

I would! :)

-Toke

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUEsCPAAoJEENeEGz1+utPw6cH/RUoMDeXNdTvC/f2Pd+vYc1p
GoRNT2bWAHCeliSGdzC6hLUw3t9L+Hkk36oKEH9zQMbp8yt6qhFAiOBhzcEt71o3
WBah+Mv5igi2oRfK7Enf6ms+O3Q1fqx4hKDQA+Nm3lOPIKgy3q0+vXN5FhMbkdUq
wM2GZ8o6tTLy9eD01tRRx+WExaMnxYSbmN9WjCz+kDHFQjFzsoNDbEYaapb/wEZr
GfJteIufrU6AVJe8v57Ix5LjprarFWKzJEJibwq8YFaS+dnkIsoryv8buVK9OBEC
qgLDWO1TXYIqDgvkYOC3YXv5RXDalPSiR41mgpjeQp5DhzHLgOy45oGhDXyUQtE=
=s6S+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--