From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [144.76.141.112])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D277C21F6B0;
	Sat, 30 Aug 2014 06:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk
Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 633FF57EED; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 15:03:21 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310;
	t=1409403992; bh=H2USw/+fuJPZzHTAMMCTuvPjSOj//OxwxtSUJF3n5yI=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=siyPiQ2qpLUh7uOOOCBI9R/Es3rKx9zbikWcdgwuRLSGom69gko5oBW9RgVLBNG+Y
	on/B0UEDHHhWycpjrgDpoWFtB4GZfHQF44IRZ+UyLu2qFQ4YOcshnZCGUJGtUXB2O+
	aNm/0zkXnKw0CoSMsS//IS6aqPlrrI8FxNshktZI=
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
References: <CALQXh-Pkqh6Wq9xc9ky0ruztu74ziUoiaiG0LPr+DVLtDqz4mQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw7q6gfS78NW8NoKH5v-azXeYW2oKWp_batvE2VM9fjrYQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<A68CC928-9C56-416C-937C-5F7E7D8DA3AD@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 15:03:19 +0200
In-Reply-To: <A68CC928-9C56-416C-937C-5F7E7D8DA3AD@gmail.com> (Jonathan
	Morton's message of "Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:02:57 +0300")
Message-ID: <87ppfijfjc.fsf@toke.dk>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Cc: cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] Comcast upped service levels ->
	WNDR3800 can't cope...
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 13:06:41 -0000

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> writes:

> Looking at the code, HTB is considerably more complex than TBF in
> Linux, and not all of the added complexity is due to being classful
> (though a lot of it is). It seems that TBF has dire warnings all over
> it about having limited packet-rate capacity which depends on the
> value of HZ, while HTB has some sort of solution to that problem.

Last I checked, those warnings were out-dated. Everything is in
nanosecond resolution now, including TBF. I've been successfully using
TBF in my experiments at bandwidths up to 100Mbps (on Intel Core2 x86
boxes, that is).

-Toke

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUAcuXAAoJEENeEGz1+utPBgUH/35RZAYaEKMwXhp+e4NNTSod
ISHFSQNS4bf+VGoDpiYI8CZJKvXQW858z2lXUsFt/o/9tbj3Zcm09ZUKDVmWuvPc
y0p+DnQoxltHgPsI/iOJXXL101gRr2pFuZ85NYRnR593Iw/BNx1y4yPs0E97/kIH
Weg1oGdLcqolmRmQwv0mZND7YUcaP7FoiSp/iOw1dGVc29E3QYJlsY8RpXZVq0et
xbfJouYaMPUveMdqOyYk/d4pvP54UxjGL7/BWUbjtIWgLE0I5m7mhZt1kadAHaku
dLI2P7aGnsl6Z/UAHMI/RpWDYZvM4JxTq1J5Wsx67VXOwhb8Gx/ypezhAsHk5Bo=
=oJ/4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--