Simon Kelley writes: > That would be possible: it would require care to make it work in the > face of the system time being warped by NTP. Best way may be to use > times() rather than time() Good point. Since the availability of reliable time is what we're waiting for, perhaps a large jump in the system clock could be taken to mean it has been achieved and taken as a signal to exit the grace period? With a timer for the case where the time is already accurate, of course. This would make it rather specific to this use case, though... -Toke