From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:3141::101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8833D21F1EE for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:12:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: by alrua-kau.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E671191C98; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:12:29 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1395677551; bh=yzGPzncwadsBVxgh/kqQy8GiZHid6J78UWGiG0EBxpA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=NP1OuJB3Wv7K3wfV5v4bac8Px+Lr1Eh1x6yC5HT8KufGfdMw9s9r9nzGoqlJ8uETp xINTXE2oLOZ6TczmnFKG24JjJxo2FFqAIrNeEjsswA5cg+AIQZBjHrjrTAPs74Walk ttdGt2+pxmNKZMYWGSwsOGB+jWyp6laJXS+xnAuY= From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Jim Gettys References: Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:12:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Jim Gettys's message of "Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:56:31 -0400") Message-ID: <87r45r7ez8.fsf@toke.dk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Wondering what dns lookups should be returning on local files... X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:12:39 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jim Gettys writes: > It looks like it tried to validate "home" (though this may be an artifact= of > chome), and returned: > > * home=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 > Secured by DNSSEC=20 > > * > Nonexistence of the domain name home > > was validated by DNSSEC. > > The parent domain is secured by DNSSEC, thus it was possible to succe= ssfully > verify nonexistence of this domain name. > > So this may be perfectly fine and expected; could be a google chome ism, = or is > just an artifact of the validator plug-in. My guess would be that it validates (from the root servers) that there's no TLD called 'home'. You could try creating a folder /com and opening a file from there, and see if it tells you that 'com' exists. I think I would consider it a bug in the validator that it doesn't exclude file:// URLs :) =2DToke --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTMFlrAAoJEENeEGz1+utPl6UH/1ykxN2lbREzN9nZri7HAZRY r/PZ2QbwheopkCMXL6FoR2I+lCQqY0unvAszGvgt3l/6k9QY2HgI9wF0xpcFhm1x p2lcsHcl73MhUZuV6sghPUKJDys8UNXeJJnxXAYkGL7xKJeeWoO42OBMpOwRGNIf mMI58kj4H7xWC+zoK4MGyhKGSM/AyG52Vf+ROfdABkntfe0wOWULvOnmOY9NU2n5 H7PZKbmShrQNMEEmscnWaDX9H4VmyR08zkk2q8uJmDuJf/OOy5waQQilEXxRN2Lo Fd+bQkjCXYI0aALfLWVaaaoi7RHe2WOYzekYp9Jib0WPqy6UjhqZvN5NjX5KnWc= =BIOK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--