From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:3141::101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87DB421F15E for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:25:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 76A0617ED0; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 00:27:05 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1392420324; bh=azuqWmIBm6aXbzLtjnCxAAU5x0HfRJIfavN/2ZQe4nY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=huRvgi3nIeaSu3F0ZupfEAY1Rj2O//OEsvoPjinugggcsFtDC5rq8S0cvqL4oU92f +feoHLiTkxTD7EpQTLJzEJrxFn0C1ypfaqG/i5TULaBehkS3jmGfCusfhe4iWsldhj IUWPyJj4/SSbK7uxEMoMQxyNdQFe+feX+X96Ssro= From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Dave Taht References: Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 00:27:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Dave Taht's message of "Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:15:16 -0500") Message-ID: <87r475i8c8.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Evan Hunt , Ted Lemon , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] dhcpv4 to slaac naming rfc ready to submit X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 23:25:35 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Dave Taht writes: > I can't see anything else to add. Eyeballs and reviewers wanted! > > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/draft-taht-kelly-hunt-dhpv4-to-slaac-naming-00.html I found it quite clear. Also, useful; for instance I hadn't noticed this doesn't work with Windows boxes... Only thing I found to correct (apart from a couple of typos that I assume Simon has already fixed) is the broken reference to RFC4443 :) -Toke --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS/qZHAAoJEENeEGz1+utP5bMH/igtXXCv66FOdZQWc7rDtv2p dlk9ED08Oq9VMcph6iilAoDp3fChyl8AOHA9N3/9i3rNxKFepVG0riC2UWTAvuUt nar1ZGjfPwwk8KWrws203hJkhzQ1hv/NCpJl4sezxe1KJC8Bfp7jEtWCap6WOigu EYix0GLEtvAYS3Oosj2IopVM3qQB+Wqxw/BpB3Je8gB9zeLbv+qP/mRcGpVfSyhG JGyIBSztTnYzjHYDknEpYPKKUYtYzUhQ/uaB1kuiRFvICxbXqij6r8quK92H/4Ml FkXoE8nVq10+5zfLrt8TJu8mfuXUctbJBPE6HJ0pPitk4jaekyWGrOUnrDEphMU= =ONtL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--