From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.tohojo.dk (mail.tohojo.dk [188.40.53.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 520C721F207 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alrua-desktop.borgediget.toke.dk (unknown [10.42.3.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tohojo.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4740A1EC0907; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:29:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alrua-desktop.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 97A5DF3BB; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:29:44 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Rich Brown References: <87ip1dpw2y.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:29:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Rich Brown's message of "Sun, 16 Jun 2013 18:08:30 -0400") Message-ID: <87sj0hofjf.fsf@toke.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Field Report - installing 3.8.13-7 X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:29:47 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rich Brown writes: > As noted above, 6in4 addresses seem to work, however, I did see a lot > of error messages as a result of running the 6in4 tunnel configuration > script. I've attached it to see if there's anything amiss=E2=80=A6 Have never used the 6in4 script, but a few of the messages have to do with the new firewall script: > Warning: Option @defaults[0].synflood_rate has invalid value '200' This is because the value is wrong. It should be '200/s' and not '200'. That's a bug, I believe (though a minor one). Fixed in git; you can manually add the /s in your /etc/config/firewall if you want to shut it up. :) > Warning: Section @rule[0] (domain) does not specify a protocol, > assuming TCP+UDP The new firewall script complains when no protocol is set, but it does the right thing, so not really sure if I would call it a bug; should be fixed in git as well, though. The rest of the output is because the new firewall is more verbose than the old one. =2DToke --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRvjxUAAoJEENeEGz1+utP6F4IAMsE5pBE+ys/S/cuvIIwvqGG uWPNLil6ndbi9BOV8vMclyp9mJASqGS9Ib6PQ1z5H3kavfoyVlOsaFkhVT41LFNx kOqVJDRm2UJycT5xAbmrpNIm2O+Xra3bs6yFJ8Pf3ufQBbzggQFyMXE7IfDt5pgL Oa0ANgsgaRPkmAIYPDM78lnjGKByRF29ibWLhYIgHaqBNidaR5i4u4kNLUmmdyJy r8SqAKA8keqQQ8IPtE/y1Pce7hHLEUfwYMWASL51bFoHHU63WTmPiYGMHtvh5+X2 Rtto4hnJeSFIjkqX4jNurEXfqABY/y7E+fK0fvmsgseUO64FC/Tud7NVhWAlBXE= =fsYD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--