From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:3141::101])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E443D21F1C6
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Sun, 19 Jan 2014 11:00:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
Sender: toke@toke.dk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310;
	t=1390158029; bh=jIOBeDjpJF+LV6Rgj2SqpkM7lHIz8cjpCz2A/Dgti1w=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=ZoWQ+mcTeiEYwoauRMMTdJEtMHNpneAaxKU+OXc3NJ/TOqa2pISj2PEHERwP8BcwY
	HuadoA/1kf3gtrNcDm8iqw3GD09TSrXQZbkQL2F+xZMPJkRM8ul77hLGxNLwlDNPUE
	D5is08g0K/piJB5o5gW/XwltsBPy0AciryMc/z3I=
Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id AA0C0141B5; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 20:01:54 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
References: <CALQXh-PCPjr=Fi0pR3zdpaswo47Ozi59d5Zk3+FV1Lpp4Km_8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<AB9DEDB8-67D0-44A8-8F48-7971E8CF9685@gmx.de>
	<CALQXh-PETSVD9cTJLr-yfdwpypZgHnV6+XyTcDD3iNOaO-La+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<957858c7-f436-47ec-a55f-d46c6441212a@email.android.com>
	<BDC09B87-AB4B-4D40-9EB0-D355023B4F29@gmail.com>
	<F201A70B-0A7A-4178-BC74-CC7B78B34910@gmx.de>
	<CAA93jw6S3AL85N3O-dQ09LyLvN3VdL5P9x-AtZfiEDp_0U39oA@mail.gmail.com>
	<FAEAB647-E70F-4EA6-A510-612F1DF9E5F5@gmx.de>
	<CAA93jw7_ao9N22W5B0K11P53Tp7QNFokEgGUkbJ1ih_+N9UWVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87a9eu4b78.fsf@toke.dk>
	<CAA93jw4p7_XUxqotRUB71aoaESrX8P8moy4bYYYQNnf5heFqUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 20:01:52 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4p7_XUxqotRUB71aoaESrX8P8moy4bYYYQNnf5heFqUQ@mail.gmail.com>
	(Dave Taht's message of "Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:17:54 -0500")
Message-ID: <87wqhv3ie7.fsf@toke.dk>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Cc: cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Managed to break 802.11n (on a 3800)
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 19:00:51 -0000

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:

> hah. Calling it that is the opposite of my intent with default blow-up
> of 802.11e - which has been to convince everyone it's busted and to
> fix it.
>
> rrul_be ?

Added an rrul_be test to netperf-wrapper git. Will do a new release
version once I've fixed one or two other things. :)

-Toke

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS3CEgAAoJEENeEGz1+utPshAIAJzCxs1WyNN57IpS6Y13ZX/A
EwSiBrzljqGuFlQ2//66SoiIZ93Y0K9MyHmfT7EOFBqGVUnlwhVPUJQlggGP16Eo
UryH6abU3QO2rEZ4MYBA/pUEf8LxgI6DrfYvY+Ynu7NIvCmUnHkVS2bHfuhmNMkF
bdNiWswye+2m7AvTnRoTYj+Mp0wi5/VFxEd0YFYl6U5G4XCHhg/6axuEnFWrbk+S
b6td5E+VfxLfwDWe4q3vkluzAlHwHbiCDUTbrBPy+DZBsMwBUlFWeYw2Q61qTC4C
ToGMvS43r+oeswbR3CQmHiZktZZEJ/u1Rf0sNeCblJc4mChMqCNnp2IE5Q9+wyc=
=Z2lz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--