David Lang <david@lang.hm> writes:

> I believe that Linux allows having both tagged and untagged packets on
> the samy physical interface, so the APs could communicate on a VLAN
> and one could be the gateway to the rest of the network (similar type
> of overhead in this case to GRE tunnels in that all traffic would get
> routed through one system, but I think it would still be less)

What happens to the VLAN tags if the traffic goes through a
non-VLAN-aware switch?

Also, presumably you would need one VLAN/tunnel for each wireless
network (so four in the default cerowrt setup)?

-Toke