From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <moeller0@gmx.de>
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "mout.gmx.net",
	Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D58321F20C
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hms-beagle.lan ([134.2.89.70]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with
	ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LoVvG-1YLsKk1x74-00gYzw;
	Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:43:40 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <CALQXh-M1zLNF8PXt=L55nLQkvMZzgwFRsQTr7tUY+cgNxehp2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:43:40 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <88133141-A68D-44FE-B41D-6FB7D8C4AAEC@gmx.de>
References: <CAAMzHDay9etZhCTcMzz_U3S2Ombym_9c8jXUA5O2DWej45P2-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw7q+ja_pW0vT6x1TB2qHShXnEMY8RJbpP_FquZEWsMAig@mail.gmail.com>
	<7B5DD5A3-D273-4708-909C-5B5D5DE72282@gmx.de>
	<CAA93jw6DFxoDaRVCoQn=zxbOjgQ-dA1bCZ1W=p9br25jWrRgkg@mail.gmail.com>
	<440DFB9A-C4F8-4723-A407-20ABDBB7BD09@gmx.de>
	<CAA93jw6s6YDhwbR57Oy3QD6EmJFAwu-N5TQ7UfCkGw9MoGwGNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw5zxcTQAuNN5EQ9jMW-pE8=-sqm+stzOmra+PQS0xP-4A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALQXh-M1zLNF8PXt=L55nLQkvMZzgwFRsQTr7tUY+cgNxehp2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:OdXAAJCjUVBOG6xbiCveeJwCpKYCr8DjkcdX/0TnNLjBR/wWkHf
	IDnuwgVm8dR179spKLvbw9Mfho9QOPNBzfgdowwMCk2CWdYqnJPLM/bxUJjMw0hk9SHFNmc
	i/1C9vf8gd7UuwMI6Mr/q93tzoNkDTpRxqvE4X3nYqnD1n8jCj+vWPgf3mq4rKp1R2NeHef
	s1cbboUsgtrc6gdUep14g==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Cc: cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Routing limit question
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 07:44:14 -0000

Hi Aaron,


On Oct 21, 2014, at 05:35 , Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> =
wrote:
> OK, I tried a few combinations of burst and cburst on a cerowrt box,
> using 90/10 as a up/download speed.
>=20
> burst 64000 cburst 64000 was a bit of a win, in most respects, but odd
> in others.
>=20
> Interesting....  can this be specified on the advanced options string =
(ingress only)?=20

	Unfortunately not, the advanced option string is just passed to =
the leaf qdiscs, but if you are willing to edit simple.qos you can =
change:
LQ=3D"quantum `get_mtu $IFACE $CEIL`=94

into:
LQ=3D"quantum `get_mtu $IFACE $CEIL` burst 64000 cburst 64000=94 for =
either ingress or egress or both to get the desired effect. As always =
=93tc class show dev ge00=94 and "tc class show dev ifb4ge00=94 should =
show you wether your changes took hold (assuming you use a recent =
sqm-scripts and ge00=85).
	So I probably will try to expose these options in an additional =
optional hidden-by-default entry fields in a future revision.


Best Regards
	Sebastian

>=20
> -Aaron