From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-x22f.google.com (mail-qg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B29B921FE88 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 08:16:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qgeg89 with SMTP id g89so130592081qge.3 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 08:16:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=mcXxfM/afUe0nuZDJ4sZj4LvfLfr02Us6Dygghlgoho=; b=GtN+Ad9ie6T9TV1SKqnGXeyJHJGI+rgdwLwl5AjMurnT4CPJXptFDGzn5deu8LhYHQ l+Pl56SuZGJ2vJ/2ZWTjvPSocELGwCa4KG3R2BHBtXYRr6oppq6253AcE9e7hpT0uWH4 7qX9tcRCr8QegTtIhugHCWgApgnmXpXKlVFw0BtmfqUbg28vAdlxPbi4Yo85amIfkEzZ PGRMl3ChUxBaxBC321dDc8AtPyQmv1joTzBA3anj28uxthBUHHXBMXESl2Y7dYM60IOm PGe4/zawunnV2g0wgEY0+dn1arglh0d+kAhKIWodmnttbjT6VYRPZHq2We2s66cCg6U6 k8gA== X-Received: by 10.55.33.78 with SMTP id h75mr2535187qkh.87.1436541372337; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 08:16:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from richs-mbp-13524.lan (pool-70-105-231-17.port.east.myfairpoint.net. [70.105.231.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f63sm5730622qhe.34.2015.07.10.08.16.11 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 08:16:11 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Rich Brown In-Reply-To: <559FDC38.9010400@imap.cc> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 11:16:09 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <89F3E053-5EA3-40F8-9853-4452B0722467@gmail.com> References: <559FA8D4.2030305@imap.cc> <559FDC38.9010400@imap.cc> To: Fred Stratton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: Jonathan Morton , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] "Lupin undeclared"? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:16:42 -0000 Hi Fred, I'm not familiar with "lupin undeclared" - could you send a = pointer/link? Thanks. Rich On Jul 10, 2015, at 10:52 AM, Fred Stratton = wrote: >=20 > You are absolutely correct. >=20 > I tried both a numeric overhead value, and alternatively 'pppoe-vcmux' = and 'ether-fcs' in the build I crafted based on r46006, which is lupin = undeclared version 2. Everything works as stated. >=20 > On lupin undeclared version 4, the current release based on r46117, = the values were not recognised. >=20 > Thank you. >=20 > I had cake running on a Lantiq ADSL gateway running the same r46006 = build. Unfortunately this was bricked by attempts to get homenet = working, so I have nothing to report about gateway usage at present. >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 10/07/15 13:57, Jonathan Morton wrote: >>=20 >> You're already using correct syntax - I've written it to be quite = lenient and use sensible defaults for missing information. There are = several sets of keywords and parameters which are mutually orthogonal, = and don't depend on each other, so "besteffort" has nothing to do with = "overhead" or "atm". >>=20 >> What's probably happening is that you're using a slightly old version = of the cake kernel module which lacks the overhead parameter entirely, = but a more up to date tc which does support it. We've seen this = combination crop up ourselves recently. >>=20 >> - Jonathan Morton >>=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel