From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-x22e.google.com (mail-qc0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F22321F113 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:47:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id n7so2967009qcx.33 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:47:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references; bh=HhEIJKJkwsFfK59QU+RCQ5UXmURJbLZuoQEQvb8QXws=; b=CU/e5Czx08iRqcW6uBVa0vfeocttnATM7/+xCbk6HUJ4FzaWLJ1saFoo2cCWtXb86W xQ3aKYdYFRqUDlHJEL7H8rZi6kZXg9Vd4o7ZfD1xsCvCFEOK+lEO27g1VZqL02nTiQGq MCcr575ImtHv/9kKdpVRtQ4GvjDaa4Kd40GqH5fkdIpVB37w9ocB/0Dd11CUU6t6kd7b H6O7o/hzHUwGLea5pLmUcqL6rBBhCwZsiA0c81l+fHnxDlJh6hA9v6zfnRPvAd1LIJLx idEMO0tXtikq6ORA6t+LORyFYvBJBjo3pQJbUvtwp2rR7JT5eZJQMBMKBXqkEnDm4wLh BjaA== X-Received: by 10.49.12.102 with SMTP id x6mr19758568qeb.5.1387586843209; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:47:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from richs-mbp-1684.home.lan (pool-72-87-56-202.ptldme.east.myfairpoint.net. [72.87.56.202]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n14sm18367135qav.8.2013.12.20.16.47.22 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:47:22 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\)) From: Rich Brown X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: <23CD1472-413D-47B1-84B3-4DE95DF78B64@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:47:20 -0500 Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8CF86926-CA6D-40BA-B554-61BF54C53BBB@gmail.com> References: <1D691810-3DD1-4899-9F63-E1713BD01840@gmail.com> <1387574550.00762811@apps.rackspace.com> <23CD1472-413D-47B1-84B3-4DE95DF78B64@gmx.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822) Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Anything but "AQM" X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 00:47:24 -0000 Folks, I just remembered that about a year ago, Bill McGonigle offered a = =93marketing name=94 for CeroWrt - BroadbandEQ. He wrote: > From: Bill McGonigle > Subject: Re: Dang, I forgot... > Date: December 10, 2012 11:13:55 PM EST > To: Richard Brown=20 >=20 > Rationale: Not a precise technical name, but in the vein of "WiFi" = it's > something that people can make a prior association with. Hi-Fi's and = equalizers, right?=20 > To backcronym it, "Broadband Enhanced Queueing" which ain't such a bad = description. > I know that "broadband" is technically wrong on many topologies, but = it seems to > have achieved popular usage for "high speed Internet". I realize that = Co-Del will be > also useful on non-last-mile links and such, but the intent is to have = something on a > label on a SOHO router box at the warehouse club for people to = recognize, right?=20 > Getting it in use is more important than being technically pedantic = anyway, and a catchy > marketing name seems to have worked for WiFi, err, I mean = "802.11[b,g,a,n] wireless > ethernet and associated standards." >=20 > It would be fairly simple to create a logo involving the word and = slider knobs > or something. If there's interest I could whip up a Rev. A. logo. = And, besides, > it looks like it's not in use: = https://www.google.com/search?q=3D=93broadbandeq" The name continues to grow on me=85 Rich=