From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from omr2.cc.vt.edu (omr2.cc.ipv6.vt.edu [IPv6:2001:468:c80:2105:0:24d:7091:8b9c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FEA421F1CC for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:41:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mr3.cc.vt.edu (mr3.cc.vt.edu [198.82.141.68] (may be forged)) by omr2.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s9KHfumL025570; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:41:56 -0400 Received: from auth1.smtp.vt.edu (auth1.smtp.vt.edu [198.82.161.152] (may be forged)) by mr3.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s9KHfp5s032175; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:41:56 -0400 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([IPv6:2001:468:c80:2103:b42f:faad:1835:5d57]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth1.smtp.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s9KHfoW7002127 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:41:50 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6+dev To: Dave Taht In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:03:55 -0700." From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <121767.1413574248@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1413826910_2274P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:41:50 -0400 Message-ID: <9382.1413826910@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mr3.cc.vt.edu Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] SQM in mainline openwrt, fq_codel considered for fedora default X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:42:27 -0000 --==_Exmh_1413826910_2274P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:03:55 -0700, Dave Taht said: > See: >=20 > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=3De6c253e363dee7= 7ef7e5c5f44c4ca55cded3fd47 Those guys must be stopped. Yet another time they tweak a kernel paramet= er without bothering to check the return code. (Yes, I'm still pissed at them for suddenly deciding to require cgroup su= pport in the kernel, and not even adding a check at startup and a printf =22Sor= ry, no cgroup support found=22. It just kept going, trying to use cgroups su= pport taht wasn't there, and hilarity and hijinks ensued... --==_Exmh_1413826910_2274P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iQIVAwUBVEVJXgdmEQWDXROgAQL5YBAAqGUfpEe10MV91pKI5qmHLXn6q+zpTD9D COgFwp3QtbdKCOQrheclBZ6ZSABafWIlAMNSHjbUkN/8XwCMweLPmwT5ImeqcI2n 1TINdhhPUiR2GsLOv7W4jf0h6F7c8ivgfMwzN6fBfJyppYcAzyW/SyCFNNzvCBnN ftIW9yx5DW0cUSfJ7JxD3R980AXDtIuzvNxcbEIhnf7GDJpw/A9juOQXeafygOQe LSREN9SY6RJFgldYKtulZ3KNacjhjOHRxUGcmW+SsyGgSCltVHl4eb0/fFdfNRCd vVyrT4jWlkhJT+1PpnGkGUzh8MiXSJEyEZ6VERbK11c6bApuyXUhe6yVGxbjJq0/ y4t0QU6QcsZ9VmfCA0B7d99offZRw1kjEC0wh96/lBoJWxxA1T9cpcgM8AnbIjOs O4gn/SSJpWF3dELk3chLCqvmpq67nfOzV6Co4vIEiosfkT6AB4MtCMNjBELH08ri IaGhzTyGyS2UKrXgVkZr6KY+f3QpUZ5nSsvVeOeXKRF1I8hLc7VXlrVG21lj5Rwn hc2b4a1ABNceEy6GKHtBwmPP07SVQOHRpUCXM5zMcWNaA+WTYmodDHUKmLwBUcvy j8otM9lUrjU17f2lk1jmMKEOtUheFkvu1vKp4xdvw6+rWNxQ87Bc9Dwod7//XCIL H6lXejogavU= =0M+v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1413826910_2274P--