From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 024CB21F1A5 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:20:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.24.85.136] ([80.187.108.79]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M9K5G-1WC8ca4C4c-00Chzz for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:20:23 +0100 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Sebastian Moeller Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:20:12 +0100 To: Aaron Wood Message-ID: <957858c7-f436-47ec-a55f-d46c6441212a@email.android.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:2ROdPNYJZUANUMRlO7RAa2/cMnOJkq3YNnz1jp6ZGXabJAw1RgG g4KBgc3Tg9FSZRkK5jSvnh9X+D2TDVh0l+PKGGBjpMgb9/TOYZ7W0Vh/z8+1+QfWbJ8r4qF 4KcHQE+7cmJXRStrgTGGEbuLg4U84TpQJZRhwO9L7AAG44z8LPtco+3blsCICvyFWih49Ub mBQC2aAyy5JD095qqK0vw== Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Managed to break 802.11n (on a 3800) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:20:48 -0000 Aaron Wood wrote: >> >> > The 5GHz radio on my 3800 seems to be in a very odd state=2E I'm not >> quire sure what state it's in, but it seems to be only doing HT20 >1x1=2E And >> in a fairly broken manner at that=2E >> > >> > Running the rrul test (over wifi directly to the router as the >> netserver), tcp uploads were 25Mbps or so, but download was 5Mbps=2E >> >> This is with your mac? Try rrul_noclassification, macosx (at >least >> 10=2E8) will not do RRUL fair to a fast host=2E Why I do not know=E2=80= =A6 it >always >> prioritizes the upload, as if it did not see/trust the downstream >markings >> (heck maybe it is busy using all bandwidth for upstream so that it >> literally never sees the markings on the downstream packets=2E=2E) >> >> About the other issue I do not know anything=2E=2E=2E > > > >Sebastian, after sorting out the router, it's still biased, but far >less >so, about a 2:1 ratio between upload and download=2E So I See offen 10:1 and worse @165Mbit/s raw wireless rate=2E > >Also, my understanding was that with rts/cts, the router was in control >of >that aspect of things? =20 That is what I thought AS well, but it is not what I See with osx 10= =2E8=2E So the AP should be able to balance those? (or >perhaps the swamped load on the router is interfering, I'd need another >full-size machine on the wired side of the AP to know for sure=2E So if I RRUL from wireless over cerowrt to a wired host in my networ= k I still get the imbalance from macosx, so I assume it is a macos thing=2E= =2E=2E Best=20 Sebastian > >-Aaron Hi Aaron --=20 Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E