From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E2222005CA for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hms-beagle.home.lan ([217.237.68.126]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LsCAp-1aVFos12rP-013yKO; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:26:33 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:26:32 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <97FBFC7A-625C-4597-A5D0-A075FD0F9533@gmx.de> References: <562A5BE5.6010101@gmail.com> <8AAB9319-17D4-40E5-B5B6-DABCB63864CF@gmx.de> <562CF0E6.5050700@gmail.com> <562CFE58.9080806@gmail.com> <562D353D.9000308@gmail.com> <562E1C37.4000506@gmail.com> <02FDF355-F509-47E2-B63C-20CCE0ACA890@gmx.de> To: David Lang X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:JelBfD1thwgkgGdshoib5KDIAZh4WjHow5ZlNnru9brAd8GSEwh bbDl6GkVYihNIEgAOeq6CHt/axYvemWaExtLQLke2QEnhftu8KQEQW7UHx5EC3Lwatl5t0v ERDbUFnfzpV8TONCZKBcfba0S2pcCRlFtcVmbS4Hy4H1pv91ewVHXNwLXI5Y6QPYz/aNndm a/1ueesdfTtznLuCfdqFA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:gWYHezqV5Co=:DtMGp7Kr+6ZMvu/THDIqTh s0GXlkQVmQst81eMWj5FiOOxCvD0mydZmbmgngJBvE1h8K6uF2AEZflv/pj/g+H6ntyolDmzM 9pfEINjG3n6oCaAnt0vTNHmRZuGOj5e7AhAhmYy2FxUTaOfy+I07tlxqei/ViEygw2L+z+Cea ZDBFUgPfD8BkzANfs/Kt7JHCfChu+webxVdTV/hZl8YA+UBKCdc5IxzUDAKYuJn8KMZl9+pme IULleIFaO1Ue3Urx2DKxuFGks2GcFXjra06ovC6nV1HjyYHQIH+qAHJ7gzOTFhEIdJ5iYdaUS 5nUljqlTQDQ7W0LTjiylut+7BdIR8wZWEc7t3OM16k89ZBPH1sjLgCNXwnaoDKMelLZX2GECX hLmwHprjJ1+aBX0BmKjg0eg9JMDxJme171wnlbcqJ9dKISDcnLNPlGrpLZZKuNQJBsJnm7Tpi 1shOf37Q67XFWL1x2gZgFTB+/XIV3rAKbh+vtlsMNesNc0c9esalGnkT5E7nJzUMUkZ5X+OKf XFdDTRYTNjXeybZ2OxlERQhCozps+1luehB6ZgVcvuhpwmOQgHBwuiGKynm85ygQ4q1BQU50K 0tOdvCcW1T5qBupRfmUH7dYrtDHF/DnIkfgHZwvD7RQywWt8DyaiZINsnQoSVSeGnSerh1L8r 1nkGT3KOdsWzrvZj23tMU//4J6H7469jVEjruZzGxl/RVFir79QvaXGuLkeZHMFY6yrK+pq8U 2eXVde6bi6WjkJQuLY5kYrD8rCKGig+obttuoyFYOCz1L1hPEX7jdv7fR2ERLSDP704Veqz5n gNHpGji Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm (solved) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:27:10 -0000 Hi David, On Oct 26, 2015, at 19:15 , David Lang wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Dave Taht wrote: >=20 >> in terms of testing wifi, the most useful series of tests to conduct >> at the moment - since we plan to fix per station queuing soon >=20 > how soon is 'soon'? I'm going to be building my image for Scale in the = next few weeks, any chance of having this available to put in it? Oh, interesting, slightly related question, do you typically = disable offloads for your scale deployed APs, or do you run with them = enabled? (I am pondering whether to expose a n offload toggle in = luci-ap-sqm, but that only makes sense if there are users willing to = test the functionality more often than once off). (Then again you = probably do not use the GUI in the first place in your deployment ;) = or?) Best Regards Sebastian >=20 > David Lang