From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (unknown [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A98621F38C for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 16:23:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796BB2002D; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 19:24:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 55FCE63B0E; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 19:23:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4067A63B09; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 19:23:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: Dave Taht In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.44-6 report X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 23:23:48 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dave Taht wrote: > I have been pounding several cerowrt boxes utterly flat for 13 days n= ow. > root@davedesk:~# uptime > 20:54:29 up 13 days, 13:28, load average: 0.04, 0.04, 0.04 (well, > formerly flat prior to this email) > Aside from seeing one kernel trap (see bug #442) for it, it's stayed > up on wifi, reliably for 10s of thousands of tests... for me. > I have - along the way - collected gigabytes of useless packet > captures, crashed every serial dongle I own, the 802.11ac ap I'm > working on, windows multiple times, and linux on a pair of laptops, > and reduced multiple beaglebones with the edimax 802.11ac to > gibbering, crashed hysteria unrecoverable even with a usb serial > connection, needing a reflash. > but never cerowrt. So I'm happy about that,=20 YEAH! KUDOS > I really, really, really, really wanted a stable cerowrt release, and > then to move on. I'd hoped that 3.10.44-6 would have been it. I've > thought about putting out a bug bounty for it, if that would find > someone with the wherewithal to nail this !@#! thing to the floor. > In the interim, I'd like to make clear to everyone that I regard bug > 442 as the only thing holding up a general stable release, and there > have been a couple updates to it. I have no OSX at my house... it all... well, it's all Linux (debian/Android/Chrome), with some cisco phones and switches. I've never seen 442-type thing on any release. My understanding is that a power cycle of the cerowrt fixes the 442 problem? Lots of "factory ROMs" need to be power cycled weekly. So my take is to go forward like this. > http://www.teklibre.com/~d/elwr/emails.html > My first documented encounter with the need for aqm and packet > scheduling on wireless was: > Mon, 19 Oct 1998 19:18:09 ha. =2D-=20 ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh network= s [=20 ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect= [=20 ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails = [=20 =09 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBU73O/4CLcPvd0N1lAQLsNQf8CqefBMX2ogfasD5m7oj4pZeHpiYokV91 2jljpGXbRh8ocdHYF4lf5v7BM4V36phaXmd9U3IympniihYNrOk3sy3VCZiZygL6 RmHFYjVllVWmUUKOEnq+2qEUszdavbCNAnbj8l0H8C7bk35mm09130bjFVzhxhaM xax7atWqbatHk0pU6Eh6yh7FSdyWcF9QyldkiKsiwHqLBiwn4TN7T9VwvmEiGjRH x9TduQz3YDTWmEN8TCuqdIhcg3nrpxwdTxLvr1M0M11dliMjY9mAHv7H9qObIpOi lpmHgRVnb9VD7tYxWXbyp70xMjHmr9cR+peLFrzjjrdsExQ4vMIt6w== =yxnA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--