From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <moeller0@gmx.de>
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "mout.gmx.net",
	Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7665F21F1E0
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Sun,  5 Oct 2014 12:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hms-beagle-3.home.lan ([93.194.234.44]) by mail.gmx.com
	(mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MI9n0-1Xehcz134I-003ySw;
	Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:36:35 +0200
From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <985A1E81-D718-450E-BC98-21962CE6A72F@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:36:33 +0200
To: =?windows-1252?Q?Dave_T=E4ht?= <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
	cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:KFVUhpoZ3J7ieV/amZ7SBtu59GA1Iuj9iSZGFYu8jtiYez9kQ47
	GytyuVP1MW0brdUfPBMtn1miMC07iLrobuUW01bKL94W+uPehTNE58eOY/MljF7znykPmw0
	+tJZRLCjowAqABdmLMgt2IWcWQHlx3c70j775uEW3SXe2AvAWLCjGQyqtCiM3wrijUbc316
	gE5lJd2OOAVTLGWRxanhg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] paging all SQM users on PPPoE links...
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:37:08 -0000

Hi Dave, hi list,

I just checked in a modification to luci-app-sqm that should allow to =
select PPPoE interfaces like pppeo-ge00 from the =93interface name=94 =
drop down menu in SQM=92s luci GUI. To be honest this interface box now =
presents everything in /sys/class/net, including a few gems like all =
IFBs and other interfaces that are not really sane choices for SQM; but =
unlike the saner old implementation it also shows the pppoe interfaces =
(anybody who has a better idea of how to get a sane but complete-enuogh =
list of interfaces to shape on please holler). This is =93exciting=94 as =
I just ran a number of tests over PPPoE (on a ADSL2+ link) confirming =
that egress classification is only honored if the pppoe interface is =
selected, not with just ge00. Also, in case someone wants to =
independently confirm, for the PPPoE interface the kernel does not seem =
to add any overhead whatsoever, so I had to specify per packet overhead =
of 40 (instead of the 26 that proved to work well with ge00, as I =
recently =93found out=94 thanks to Andy Furniss).

	Anyway, I assume the commit is not sufficiently tested and would =
like to recruit volunteers to test this change on their live systems ;) =
(just copy =
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10/b8d62e1c0540fc83=
2e4ef9dea44899e4939c1d93/luci/luci-app-sqm/files/sqm-cbi.lua to =
root@gw.home.lan/usr/lib/lua/luci/model/cbi/sqm.lua on your cerowrt =
router (I assume 3.10.50-1)). Please let me know how this works out=85

Best Regards
	Sebastian