From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from z.eggo.org (z.eggo.org [80.235.105.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52AEB3B2B6 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:36:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.eggo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39191580103 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:36:41 +0300 (EEST) Received: from z.eggo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z.eggo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id PSaxcl4JcAlI for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:36:41 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.eggo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17343580111 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:36:41 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at harvee.org Received: from z.eggo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z.eggo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id gItJ8fSouBdW for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:36:40 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [192.168.9.98] (unknown [146.115.109.236]) by z.eggo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77DDF580103 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:36:40 +0300 (EEST) To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <87lh1xihnv.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <87vb0zpnel.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <87oa6rpl7h.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <87mvmbpi7d.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <0173B4D2-C84A-4200-B388-F8E964CAEB86@gmail.com> <87mvma26gf.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> From: Eric Johansson Message-ID: <9a37f44d-7e6b-f31f-58ad-1dd7eac8ee71@eggo.org> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:36:37 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87mvma26gf.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------D0B1A5419E8A8529653CAB82" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Why we are discussing ARM [was: Cross-compiling to armhf] X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:36:42 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------D0B1A5419E8A8529653CAB82 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 6/24/2016 7:04 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > Agreed. Who's going to save us? * kickstart our own, * license a design and enhance it to our needs (rpi 4??) * work a deal with mikrotek to freeup docs on one of their boards so we can replace router os with one of our own. see http://www.balticnetworks.com/mikrotik-hap-ac-lite-dual-band-indoor-a= ccess-point-built-in-antennas.html.=20 --------------D0B1A5419E8A8529653CAB82 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 6/24/2016 7:04 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Agreed. Who's going to save us?

  • kickstart our own,
  • license a design and enhance it to our needs (rpi 4??)
  • work a deal with mikrotek to freeup docs on one of their boards so we can replace router os with one of our own. see