From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com (mail-qg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A09B021F794 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 10:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qgad10 with SMTP id d10so103436493qga.3 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 10:36:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=p64Ia1a1EK+2hTzT9Y/1+4if3iq7HCju/fkDaZT2STw=; b=Ph5WUW1gsLckoLj3vTll2pvztyO0xIfZbMR3HORjF5uQxTyhWDw71G/j3JH6A0M+uU jtvDmqgVT0ZTmq9jHPhdC77d5pzfN7DV2Tt0d7eYdXxtwyExKYYbhO5nGitSuAYX8jJh A6xXDKHEc55ae/x07JS1UYc6+ysqyj3374ZnfGPefduxceLG7zBCxSL5aJbEp2mf60OL Yoblc5dsXq4qqBeI9RvmA4kSxcfLt4kvTM4MssNjzgbkZUti+X8sS4PrTEhpSIWmuY41 r2PgU+5M4xi0v3WHXg7L6+6QH+qKzNQItJIqQrlooW66rJkM/aburwPc38s1JHSfQiBv Sh1w== X-Received: by 10.140.151.138 with SMTP id 132mr39049761qhx.72.1445794566045; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 10:36:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from richs-mbp-5.lan (pool-64-222-208-81.port.east.myfairpoint.net. [64.222.208.81]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i34sm11561620qgd.8.2015.10.25.10.36.04 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 25 Oct 2015 10:36:05 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Rich Brown In-Reply-To: <562CFE58.9080806@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 13:36:03 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <562A5BE5.6010101@gmail.com> <8AAB9319-17D4-40E5-B5B6-DABCB63864CF@gmx.de> <562CF0E6.5050700@gmail.com> <562CFE58.9080806@gmail.com> To: Richard Smith X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm (solved) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 17:36:29 -0000 Hi Richard, > On Oct 25, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Richard Smith = wrote: >=20 > Sigh. Sorry for all the noise. Thanks for everyones help. Now I'll = get back to the original task of comparing the performance of the = 1900acs factory firmware vs openwrt trunk with sqm. Actually, this is a great relief to me (and, I imagine, the others on = the list). We really do believe in this stuff. We've seen it work. But each of us = is enough of a scientist to believe that *we could be wrong*. (I suspect = that's why you really got everyone's attention) But, what a relief! Science Triumphs again! And now that we have a sound = basis for understanding what was wrong, a) we have one more item for our = troubleshooting questionnaire, and b) we can go back to feeling just a = little bit smug :-) Thanks for sticking with us.=20 Rich PS We'd love to hear the results of the experiment you really were = trying to perform.=