From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <moeller0@gmx.de>
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "mout.gmx.net",
	Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27B1021FC59
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from u-089-d065.biologie.uni-tuebingen.de ([134.2.89.65]) by
	mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id
	0LgIWi-1YfbDW3C6e-00ngrS; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:56:22 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506290952050.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:56:31 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AA9E964C-06E9-4618-95D5-453D71F02A20@gmx.de>
References: <CANmMgnF7eE4_eZu=LySLj9LEtqS5+b=c8zMf3c4vOb2sHx0a5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw6+WVcNfaJg8jVf=xJY02cCKSK+3JDe5fmV0spm-oT0gw@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506270654140.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<CAA93jw51A_ikG4vzpqOJ56FqQa1f=xW=aK8yyPw0tK8zS29u-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<8B853F1C-DE5D-4F3D-88CC-CB8DA2D3E8B1@gmx.de>
	<C91BE0FA-60DA-4655-A725-7CFF8522656D@gmx.de>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506281927150.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<CAJq5cE1zQDp3opc3dYX3fv6=qvsfhytLnmq1hB9PaQFbdp0Keg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw6ULj5MmAxbBM-h8e0i19os_cqP_K7Y4UbintkHXj2A2w@mail.gmail.com>
	<04331509-F163-4184-90B4-8589073AFD62@gmx.de>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506282116310.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<09BA156C-460D-4794-A082-33E805F3D6FD@gmx.de>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506282247120.948 7@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<5436B48C-0803-46DA-B355-14E917A5BB37@gmx.de>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506290650350.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506290709130.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<F3088E9D-E022-4CFF-AE1A-D3A0934FDDAF@gmx.de>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506290952050.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:PkXiDxzIlTQgRk46wAsm2i57c02zUHJHdJ0G5smcvW+ka323FYE
	VmOHX7Y2XyN/fSYqQ6XnGnII4VSuGKGELhUhp6MWFLSJUwn5t8w3E6vO6eIv+RL49z2y1lO
	MgzUhpQIsW2Ob0L4VWa5YRoInavX/h+YjJfFEh3T41guAaUYzFdE/UZikXO3yhT6HwRriyB
	ZoeCMmJwaHp/IV5x7q7dQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:hBS9E9N1kDU=:Dq3uvWcdewePMe++K092B5
	+9fREBWNyszcWYyhdibGYGd+v732KqQln//Grurtav5xfuOxZW2cXtDxs5xP6jocbICcoNC/f
	j3kxjbD85L1BUiJmE1tFpumbetGoH69Y2o4UbLCxiYGJQgDVEMSZrUw0VBKVaOFWb/78BZHyb
	Vj0ALxumJXi4o9T/soM4Sz32LgHD5DrT/m75Lhh7B5mlxDvOfeFgdkaH8gSI7KjwsDzU26On1
	/CTM9rl8KG0ebL+5SOp7r2Ili3qgPPvw4LMl4rh7g6ifTJ2bhFqThpSNvLoGcu9yuVGr3FY8r
	gLCVX9qdwBHQsj/dXLPDK0DphzmjRHTVvsWg/B/HBp5Wo5ItDfAei3rwKfsQmoUG/8cZ1QzuI
	2Zld5C7AfC0C9GVzJWCFSQ0fiOmTOzVcSwG+A+iuGCnKFz+d8fbIdWBI8ZcQkaBMFBcIOWgm0
	tUIDAC446QU3fQS2Ibv67N4X/77lc7bi623DygOQUsTW850Swcx6Buv+YVaqgB167afMgIQSp
	W7FkIkP6nX92LvfPLAbQi8j+qksrliCBKa11KGjl0FKAwf84yEW99G5gN4t+P2453wrn5BihL
	286Pfgrnq6QrEMJPelf58GMm9VAvE42srHH0Xq82pSkahYNegyk6Pb9TSoOybmnqodOmsftLV
	99fWFjRMeBZOgZtHGz3+5brPvVGiq0+kXCX5ArsEm/oU7e9LTP6VNpknvcXPu8GXCfwM=
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest
	build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work;
	"cake overhead 40" didn't)
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 07:56:55 -0000

HI Mikael,


On Jun 29, 2015, at 09:54 , Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>=20
>> 	Good work-around; not a real solution as sqm_logger() will also =
add "SQM:=94. I think the solution most likely is to remove line 155 =
completely. But weirdly this seems to work with cerowrt=85
>=20
> May I suggest a wrapper around the logger part that handles this case, =
ie if the string is empty? Because when the string is empty and it gets =
stuck, luci just waits and waits and waits. I mean, this specific case =
can be fixed, but for the future it would be more robust if this error =
case can't happen at all.

	Sounds reasonably defensive; what irk me is that in my testbed =
that specific error does not crop up; one more reason to code defensive =
I guess=85

Best Regards
	Sebastian

>=20
> --=20
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se