From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65C442007D0 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 06:15:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from u-081-c074.eap.uni-tuebingen.de ([134.2.81.74]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MU0U9-1W1Bp32UrZ-00Ql0R for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:15:28 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: <34E77F64-739C-49E4-B8A4-6ABBEAE4174B@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:15:29 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <34E77F64-739C-49E4-B8A4-6ABBEAE4174B@gmail.com> To: Rich Brown X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+JPZ+PDPYf9X6BfOHy+uFZMMyaq9iAdbArW+MOyhm/hYHa+o5j8 2QateUI3ANr7Ca3VtD0Y1OHqabjTvsiUItVpb4D43x2E1w4Rn0UuQXXaHPzgFITnGAIneIt rrXM1uoIhjZQ58MU8/Z6Tinm3+C8LA3Z6G4GNIO2eko7puam4ffBwdNQC9zAbEpAhKygsUh HYU/XXjJipHQHqnNa5vZQ== Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.24-5 dev build released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:15:31 -0000 Hi Rich, On Dec 16, 2013, at 14:45 , Rich Brown wrote: > Dave, List, >=20 >> + hopefully nasty interface initialization bug fixed >> http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/437 >=20 > In a one-out-of-one test, this build causes all six wireless = interfaces to start up: CEROwrt (and guest) on 2.4 and 5 GHz, and both = babel SSID=92s. >=20 > In addition, the =91wifi=92 command does not give any diagnostic = output as I had mentioned in my earlier message. >=20 > Keepin=92 my fingers crossed. That sounds quite promising. I would be delighted, if stability = permits, if you could test the current AQM implementation and send me = your feedback and or open questions. It seems I have been looking at the = link layer issue for so long that I do not realize which information is = required so please let me know if parts are to terse or too verbose. Best Regards sebastian >=20 > Rich > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel