From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] archer c7 v2, policing, hostapd, test openwrt build
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 05:16:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AFD597EE-0CA3-4A40-8D5D-CD0BDE45C7C8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8AC58249-8199-405B-997A-E8F7285A34FB@gmx.de>
> On 24 Mar, 2015, at 02:00, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> So I got around to a bit of rrul testing of the dual egress idea to asses the cost of IFB, but the results are complicated (so most likely I screwed up).
IFB is normally used on the download direction (as a substitute for a lack of AQM at the ISP), so that’s the one which matters. Can you try a unidirectional test which exercises only the download direction? This should get the clearest signal - without CPU-load interference from the upload direction.
- Jonathan Morton
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-24 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-23 0:24 Dave Taht
2015-03-23 0:31 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 1:10 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 1:18 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-23 1:34 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 1:45 ` David Lang
2015-03-23 2:00 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-23 2:10 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 2:15 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-23 2:18 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-23 6:09 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-23 13:43 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 16:09 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-24 0:00 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-24 0:05 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-24 0:07 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-24 3:16 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2015-03-24 7:47 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-24 8:13 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-24 8:46 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-29 1:14 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-29 6:17 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-29 11:16 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-29 12:48 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-29 14:16 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-29 15:13 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 17:08 ` David Lang
2015-03-23 16:17 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-23 16:27 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-23 17:07 ` David Lang
2015-03-23 18:16 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AFD597EE-0CA3-4A40-8D5D-CD0BDE45C7C8@gmail.com \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox