From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qc0-x229.google.com (mail-qc0-x229.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92C3321F568;
	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id r5so61104qcx.28
	for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
	bh=Xk3DVtstrsJCB4m76jJAKZ7pSJp7IQoYzcSeCW2zwuM=;
	b=YOjtv+oHw0JzXeNIaLXeqpkKEDEjQOewDpIiKerobBDx6I2yF8wNQqn7DmXXwaCStQ
	xKkDCnaJBAT4N7lT9V0XiPadmEcIyW0mkBznFCLEgIAoYX4Z5S9SeCHsMxvjhHz8qwOs
	8kRkbvQ3HWxmzuvMPWAEM8EKJhWM7Uk7Rl7/Yj9owDBjg9py7AM1jhw4AVFtgmg6auV3
	vFksDj3V2APpIDjOY8mSncQe3vLOGLGW0SFfnL9akXD+8zvcK6jJqqrqoQAQBFoQbze+
	A01qKGHlgd4dn2VfOp7l5G/SaLVvtJf15pbg9VencBBu3aOPHhVXHtYzZY9WzEtADOY+
	IPLg==
X-Received: by 10.224.151.143 with SMTP id c15mr6606536qaw.10.1410486517027;
	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from richs-mbp-5818.home.lan
	(pool-71-241-220-44.ptldme.east.myfairpoint.net. [71.241.220.44])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v90sm2003918qge.31.2014.09.11.18.48.35
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
In-Reply-To: <45F70DEB-F0FE-45EA-8D27-EEF7C523476B@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 21:48:34 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AFED1384-C717-4D26-BA9E-1C32401A074C@gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw7Zy2vwLPcV0cb9O1jj2QU_h6Vj2fHok9fm-X7-ssnStA@mail.gmail.com>
	<A08116CF-B888-4C44-ABC6-2E6C80474C8B@gmail.com>
	<1410482143.8059509@apps.rackspace.com>
	<45F70DEB-F0FE-45EA-8D27-EEF7C523476B@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Joel_Wir=C4=81mu_Pauling?= <joel@aenertia.net>,
	Wes Felter <wmf@felter.org>, "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] Fixing bufferbloat: How about an open
	letter to the web benchmarkers?
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 01:49:06 -0000

Jonathan,

> Could we make use of the existing test servers (running netperf) for =
that demonstration?  How hard is the protocol to fake in Javascript?

Not having coded a stitch of this, I *think* it would require the =
following:

- Web page on netperf-xxx.bufferbloat.net that served out the javascript =
(required to get around cross-domain protections within the browser)

- Javascript function to connect back to that host on port 12865 and =
fake out the netserver with TCP_STREAM or TCP_MAERTS request

- Javascript that's efficient enough to source/swallow full-rate data =
stream

- Cloning the code from https://github.com/apenwarr/blip to make fake =
pings from TCP requests

Anyone know more than I do about this?

Rich=