From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E2CB21F779 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hms-beagle-7.home.lan ([217.237.70.193]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mgt3g-1ZUdcp125Q-00M2yJ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 22:47:47 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 22:47:49 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: =?windows-1252?Q?Dave_T=E4ht?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:YCQSNOyDJO/JstpZ0vVIyaiQN8L8rDoMfZoHqkn9koG1ARm8hHJ lbRN0fuqRsVjrKkVZiwiEDDvWK0AMG+jmL08OJwq5lsRXCJiimrEAzW4ai9Cj38q0wMLwdQ XcxFze3WYKV6NCwFL7akENomb1CV3hj+ybfHpnLId4BcHbbdnZetdyr6gso7aQGXqOg9akK pnUne0IFsl/+GKni3RCPw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Bd91hMILtt4=:5nPajl05otlrT4RyKA8NiW OcTwIAIxk05i1gL9nz+KZl3Zmcnevu7bsbN2ysLg20sViy4sRL0bghHBE75fmH6ZqjBYlaPGF VU4vj1OEBLxxh5TJXSB8Zy+jKh1dQt4lC21Ey6onoubRsGU4l38HJx3kQhpwDomWNaoM9xwDQ bTdQk7+V4KWeUN+08i8Labl1qXFIC1HZn5vtoloTbpi4J3vM0dbIyWIC2YDoNTPARlQvbqPuZ V3RUlPgIVKyj66fmRAiSHe6mc6RPXG0GJ2g8M/87ZJJ/mudAT4k1+kgMSscqn9AdKC+4e2iVL PLej9038MSW5Obx3qTY/JUaRgpViqGPS8XTF71rsbJVl0ZJ0Jf8LrzFUo5zXpXiov1qw4ZCCV VidxuEpVhejZtp0UwNCbuyoEHw3z4ikRY4eimQ/gNfVZUWUfsmu89XysZnWPpNDlBkR/hREXn +0QPDMvRrZ9iHzfmHZOaXvGvWnGqNiZD22z8hCCJNeD7npC/WHirGLMC1lCli7mmGT20GrO53 FtXVMwLcB6hcYQfKl1AdU/hSR00DfpT/zEgomiHMpmJLO2/bJblPuCmqizDXIH5qfMsUAmTXS HhDFSJ3P5qn8e3pFWJaGbfCbDFzpLFCRymUXMlJxyw48M9GBsb55Th9cGyRri7xcJnK0SrLrM nd7ZpUkmkgUyKPAjcYiCuAStDu5CNokRps7Fq4r4cv8x4n1XLA9rDKXYumYXKsFiBhbs= Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Any chance for the LUCI GUI for cake appearing? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:48:20 -0000 Hi Dave, hi List, On Jun 26, 2015, at 21:48 , Dave Taht wrote: > It turns out that I am pulling from openwrt for luci-app-sqm, not > ceropackages, and overriding it was a headache. Fixed now, see below >=20 I guess Toke and I need to find a better way of updating the = relevant repository=85 I had thought that ceropackages-3.0 was a = relatively confined and hence =93safe=94 testing group, so my idea was = if it does worl for the ceopackages crowd, push it onto the openwrt = community; but it seems that step is too large an impedance mismatch. So = I will try to find a way with Toke to centralize development a bit. That = scares me a bit as, knowing my level of detail, there will be lots of = fix-up work; on the other hand, changes without people to test them is = somewhat lame as well... > router# cd /tmp; wget > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/luci-app-sqm_3-5_all.ipk ; > opkg install ./luci-app-sqm_3-5_all.ipk That seems recent. I need to remember to bump so,e number on any = relevant change. My target is to change on ever bug fixes and feature = additions, but I am not in the best position to judge bug fixes = truthfully... > router # /etc/init.d/uhttpd restart >=20 > if it breaks, you get to keep both pieces, but it worked for me, and > yea! cake in the gui! thx sebastian! Yippi ya ya yippy yippy yeah. >=20 >=20 > I tried - >=20 > ./scripts feeds uninstall luci-app-sqm; ./scripts feeds install -p > cero luci-app-sqm # seemed sane, did not work > git rm in the feed itself did not work > doing the uninstall, deleting the symlink, and the git rm, nuking the > bin/ar71xx/packages/packages/luci-app-sqm* > and doing a complete rebuild... eventually did work... but strikes me > as a bit more brute force than I wanted. Fair enough, see the point above of Toke and me coming up with a = better plan to get relevant changes into tester=92s hands quicker... >=20 > I am not in a position (aformentioned build is my specialized for > pico/nano build at the moment) to update the packages db, > but I stuck up the correct new package... which you can install via >=20 >=20 > Apologies for the confusion, I simply figured that the -p option would > work, and never checked. >=20 > I also note that I think I am building things compile tuned for the > archer mips34c, rather thanthe wndr3800=B4s 24c. However I kept the > unaligned access hacks (not needed on the 34c derived archer, but > needed on the 24c wndr3800) Looking at the readily available cpu information, MIPS seems to = be severely EOL=92d. Mikael=92s result with the armada 385 seem way more = future proof (even without BQL) >=20 > Sigh. >=20 > maintaining 3 separate trees for the platforms we sort of support is a > PITA. I am happy to buy a new router to be back on board with your = development, but the mips 34c seems a bit underwhelming for the goal of = NAT-shapimg roughly 300 Mbps bi-directionally. The edgerouterX=92s = numbers also do not look too hot; Mikeal=92s numbers really made made me = reconsider my plan to get another HP priloant microsrver G8 to do duty = as PPPoE gateway router and traffic shaper. (The G8 retails fr 240 EUR = with 2.3 GHz and 2GB ram, so 200 EUR for a wrt1200ac definitely looks = like too much, even though the G* does not do wifi, but I still have the = wbdr 3700v2 to serve wireless clients...) > Then adding in something that can mesh by default on 2 others. > and then trying to get anything to compile for another arch entirely > and failing=85 >=20 As much as I would like to participate in that fun, a 1 router = household is just not interesting enough I guess ) Best Regards=09 Sebastian >=20 > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Sebastian Moeller = wrote: >> Hi Jim, >>=20 >>=20 >> On Jun 26, 2015, at 19:21 , Jim Gettys wrote: >>=20 >>> Inquiring minds would like to know=85. >>=20 >> I guess, that depends on your definition of =93LUCI GUI for = cake=94; as far as I know you can select cake in the =93Queueing = Discipline=94 drop down in the =93Queue Discipline=94 tab of = luci-app-sqm. So if the machine has the cake module and a sufficiently = recent (out-of-tree) tc binary installed it should just work. Using the = =93Advanced option strings=85=94 it even should be possible to pass = arbitrary strings to cake (without any error checking), so I assume we = are all set up for cake testing (or should that be cake tasting?) from = the LUCI GUI. But I have not managed to build cake locally, nor have I = dared to risk my families internet connectivity by trying one of Dave=92s = newer "openwrt trunk with cake=94 builds. So these changes linger in the = ceropackages-3.10 repository until we get enough tasting to convince = Toke to pull them into the openwrt repositories (these changes affect = both sqm-scripts and luci-app-sqm). Dave graciously allowed me access to = one of his test machines, and the changes allow to set up cake from the = GUI, but I only did limited functionality testing. (And we discovered = that something was of in that cake worked but did not accept all the = keywords it should have, but unless you are on a XDSL-Link you most = likely do not care about specifying per-packet-overhead) >> If you have any specific thing you are missing, let me know = and I will try to help. >>=20 >> Best Regards >> Sebastian >>=20 >>=20 >>> - Jim >>>=20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Dave T=E4ht > worldwide bufferbloat report: > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat > And: > What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? > https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast