From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73D3421F2D5 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 01:28:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from hms-beagle-2.lan ([134.2.89.70]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MZCUG-1Y7RTg1pZE-00Kx6M; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:28:08 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: <54C4CEE3.2040909@openwrt.org> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:28:06 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <63C60796-0C39-474C-B5A4-F2FCACC4592A@gmx.de> <54C4CEE3.2040909@openwrt.org> To: Felix Fietkau X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:opgjcKN3YmkrZXstYZeHxW/hOnzBrGz4jPoSaI4v6TFt+886JDL kEOlbWYTVBINmWajO2TM67b5CHUii3BdfKuyW6TwK1tSSO2GsrLNxJgE+luSq0xLqAwHp+k ABuT3yk7+kdEy3QyrBj174WbuJ2HMk/0a1yixjQ4NQ7Asy+nyloJLMx0maaHTRmIywTnvhm bRXSz+9bZOSI+yF1vfRQg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] another contender for WNDR replacement X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:28:43 -0000 Hi Felix, hi List, On Jan 25, 2015, at 12:09 , Felix Fietkau wrote: > Here's another candidate: > = http://us.dlink.com/products/connect/wireless-ac1200-dual-band-gigabit-clo= ud-router-dir-860l/ >=20 > CPU: MT7621 (dual-core MIPS, 880 MHz, 4 virtual CPUs) > The device has preliminary OpenWrt support already. In my tests, = handles > ~820 Mbit/s NAT without any special acceleration features (with = fq_codel, > no shaping). Haven't done any tests with shaping yet. > Wifi (MT7612E) is still buggy with my mt76 driver, but I'll fix that = in > March when I get back from vacation. >=20 > - Felix I am currently searching for a replacement for my wndr3700v2 as = it is running out of steam on my temporary 100/40 Mbps link. This thing = looks quite decent, but I notice between = https://wikidevi.com/wiki/D-Link_DIR-860L_rev_A1 and = https://wikidevi.com/wiki/D-Link_DIR-860L_rev_B1 that d-link reused the = sam name for quite different hardware implementations, and only the more = recent B1 revision will work for us. (Is it just me or do you also find = this tendency to not even add the revision to the official name a bit = annoying?) So, does anybody here now how to order a specific revision in = Germany? Or is the only way to wait a bit and hope the A1 revision = clears the retail channel so only B1=92s are left? I notice that from = looking at the internal photos for both devices posted on the FCC site = that the old A1 Broadcom revision has its USB port "above" the ethernet = ports while the B1 Mediatek revision has the USB port between DC in and = below the ethernet ports. Am I correct in assuming that deployed = hardware needs to match the FCC design exactly (that is, in case of = revision a new FCC submission with new photos is required)? Best Regards Sebastian=