From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] archer c7 v2, policing, hostapd, test openwrt build
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:17:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B32194B3-F830-4A71-A4F7-E388FE0C07E6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3615CBEA-5DC1-4722-9EE9-13B3570E8118@gmx.de>
> On 29 Mar, 2015, at 04:14, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> I do not think my measurements show that ingress handling via IFB is that costly (< 5% bandwidth), that avoiding it will help much.
> Also the current diffserv implementation also costs around 5% bandwidth.
That’s useful information. I may be able to calibrate that against similar tests on other hardware.
But presumably, if you remove the ingress shaping completely, it can then handle full line rate downstream? What’s the comparable overhead figure for that? You see, if we were to use a policer instead of ingress shaping, we’d not only be getting IFB and ingress Diffserv mangling out of the way, but HTB as well.
- Jonathan Morton
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-29 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-23 0:24 Dave Taht
2015-03-23 0:31 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 1:10 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 1:18 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-23 1:34 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 1:45 ` David Lang
2015-03-23 2:00 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-23 2:10 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 2:15 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-23 2:18 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-23 6:09 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-23 13:43 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 16:09 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-24 0:00 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-24 0:05 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-24 0:07 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-24 3:16 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-24 7:47 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-24 8:13 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-24 8:46 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-29 1:14 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-29 6:17 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2015-03-29 11:16 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-29 12:48 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-29 14:16 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-29 15:13 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 17:08 ` David Lang
2015-03-23 16:17 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-23 16:27 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-23 17:07 ` David Lang
2015-03-23 18:16 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B32194B3-F830-4A71-A4F7-E388FE0C07E6@gmail.com \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox