From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CBB83B29E for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 02:11:31 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1615961487; bh=WFTVKKORIJos1pediBb18xL2Ake5LnlZn/55ySlcnv4=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:CC:From; b=KwakLI8NUAHNPuAIxnn8HXHWfuQPXJaF4qYnVg1IpFRllBSZvS5etihwYIv9E25/j cRqfk8rQ8SEhJ9HpBIWmrkfy9fie8NJkp1XZoZmWV2slPArHJjnRDh2/HVSS7SMmHR k4UfMPNa9Z5ban/NSEbwd8QJ7FHkJ7CQTEk9OAH0= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.42.159] ([77.8.0.149]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MRCKC-1l1YdO3OfU-00N8lk; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:11:27 +0100 Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:11:25 +0100 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <1287379027.1155590.1615919208363.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <97BB05AF-95BB-4F0A-A6DF-4CF40686F782@gmail.com> <6866.1615935539@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----RASRJ098LSQFTDHPOSRN174O1MKBOP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, Jonathan Morton , David Lang CC: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" From: Sebastian Moeller Message-ID: X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Zqrm5NNEx6ZtB0Y/uh8dv9hESbJ2iPskX4/OscaJqPBa9YTyyyl DrlZwvTynj1ZsjkrClxULgrce8R0fvdUPKvJneQy5DdXeitZHzRcPTFyHLWkpyky5QcP8h8 AhfD7iOZumagauQX0eL80pOjk8T93x6PmFw5Mn5YmI0Hd/KJ1DT8/RRH9ZMtkNBXnMxv6wK fqtb8JOhnDxDQ9YDatj6A== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:K8N8+m373IM=:Dt0CJUA603N9+LNols2SVm SYKkpUgeMQpEaSWAJVbE3KVWTXZ4pCukICemOvQ87Yvbj6vXgw8c2Rp1bImnCVx6qFAOItenf E/3/6Qtv/d3ScEOj1/Na/h8d93Ur7H2TVbTRDfh/97vNRju/9caoZmPT0P5jR4OFi2XRxUfCp +m6pzYlHNjOCarcz7D7CjU90Xl5PO4PeRl9885S2RuPmlTmRa61d18qPMemnCSl+ltT6CYi77 7dP0vRWiW2qNstEwETlD17ptxXoqjPJ9v12rLGMJiZ3osjH+iMIVj3re8/nlhhhepcgRlilxT 35hb8rKghTeQD6H19OVwRnpSfhmBGpPFLW+1uaEo+I5TEIBZbxJsmT0QdUgoIBlQwcFRfzI8l yCFd62/9bUVoIXOoBMbFsFnBUFd7nQSgq9gEhCkLG/1tvx3vjtMXg7yrX81jWFV0BwiCBsDv/ Z9sasbw/vk/RbLVrIojcpaOwGfmg67F22zS67Tv+973kqA6hobxt0CvdAl3QWBAsg05zihfd1 J2/7j1Qy+YUXzezpvLyJwJyMP4O79Q6vDJdGn4HHMhRDSmCcDYJxA17Q/mogozVX3hgdI1v/6 1lB1On2HabuctvNYhv41+/pJPK9Y6PUUUcebdZ3yqtGFvqB6ayoSD4UDEXl/klZrNF0SqFr1D PpfG2g4hyYgEyaOyQW1xSD8uzuCqiZVZVUvHNhEcDMt4n9Q8LhEUhePOEOLdJscepYguuv0rX Y5Ih6vVZqppT86oHw4hEVQHuWBX99sRPHIKkEd3HNHUtx6UAKn6Fhj2Li7D9dxWWpH/u4mx3h 6ST6LqE5y9zFzCeBIGtYM/n7l2VwBpt5Fp6tPjpUaKxTnv2fXwbTEJF6KmMgFL38R9YhUEpzP +N04wTjt7xaEaayJZZlQ== Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Looking for MORE SQM Router Recommendations ! X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 06:11:31 -0000 ------RASRJ098LSQFTDHPOSRN174O1MKBOP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There is also an io board for the compute module that offers a PCIe slot wh= ich might could be used for a real NIC=2E=2E=2E On 17 March 2021 03:57:24 CET, Jonathan Morton w= rote: >> On 17 Mar, 2021, at 3:01 am, David Lang wrote: >>=20 >> This is using the compute module, that does not have any on-board >ports > >Actually, the CM4 brings the on-board GigE interface out to the >connector pins via a suitable PHY=2E All that is needed is a magjack on >the carrier=2E What this particular carrier does is to provide a *twin* >magjack, wire the appropriate CM4 pins to half of it, and wire the >other half to a LAN7800 USB-to-GigE adapter=2E The latter is then wired >up to the CM4 via a 4-port USB hub chip, so there are also three USB >ports (one on a header, two as physical ports)=2E > >All but the cheapest of the CM4 models also include a single-channel, >dual-band wifi/BT chip=2E This requires only an antenna to make it an >austere but probably usable AP=2E For better performance, a >multi-channel wifi adapter could be plugged into the USB header, and >the cheapest CM4 "Lite" would probably then be sufficient=2E > > - Jonathan Morton >_______________________________________________ >Cerowrt-devel mailing list >Cerowrt-devel@lists=2Ebufferbloat=2Enet >https://lists=2Ebufferbloat=2Enet/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E ------RASRJ098LSQFTDHPOSRN174O1MKBOP Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There is also an io board for the compute module t= hat offers a PCIe slot which might could be used for a real NIC=2E=2E=2E


On 17 March 2021 03:57:24 CET, Jona= than Morton <chromatix99@gmail=2Ecom> wrote:
On = 17 Mar, 2021, at 3:01 am, David Lang <david@lang=2Ehm> wrote:

= This is using the compute module, that does not have any on-board ports
=

Actually, the CM4 brings the on-board GigE interface out t= o the connector pins via a suitable PHY=2E All that is needed is a magjack= on the carrier=2E What this particular carrier does is to provide a *twin= * magjack, wire the appropriate CM4 pins to half of it, and wire the other = half to a LAN7800 USB-to-GigE adapter=2E The latter is then wired up to th= e CM4 via a 4-port USB hub chip, so there are also three USB ports (one on = a header, two as physical ports)=2E

All but the cheapest of the CM4 = models also include a single-channel, dual-band wifi/BT chip=2E This requi= res only an antenna to make it an austere but probably usable AP=2E For be= tter performance, a multi-channel wifi adapter could be plugged into the US= B header, and the cheapest CM4 "Lite" would probably then be sufficient=2E<= br>
- Jonathan Morton
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@li= sts=2Ebufferbloat=2Enet
https://lists=2Ebufferbloat=2Enet/listinfo/cerowrt-dev= el

--
Sent from my Android device w= ith K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E ------RASRJ098LSQFTDHPOSRN174O1MKBOP--