[Cerowrt-devel] AQM and ADSL

[Fred Stratton <fredstratton@imap.cc>]

(apologies for wrecking the list, and introducing email addresses in error)


Begin forwarded message
> On 13 Aug 2013, at 19:53, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>> H Fred
>> On Aug 13, 2013, at 17:28 , Fred Stratton <fredstratton@imap.cc> wrote:
>> 
>>> I have been experimenting with the two sets of modified sets of scripts and AQM panels. Thank you for constructing them.
>> 
>> 	Thanks for testing...
>> 
>>> 
>>> To mention the string ''for ATM choose' is repeated erroneously in the extended panel.
>> 
>> 	Fixed… I will try to test whether it actually works before sending the next version...
>> 
>>> 
>>> The scripts work.
>>> 
>>> The link layer giving best results is ethernet.
>> 
>> 	What and how did you measure? Using "use HTB's private mechanism for linklayer and overhead" or "Use tc's stab mechanism for linklayer and overhead"? A little browsing of the kernel source makes me believe that the HTB version is fully busted and will not do anything at all (so I would have imagined adel atm and ethernet to behave the same). I am thinking about how to test whether a link layer adjustment works or not.
> 
> Ein Fehler. I had both chosen. They are mutually exclusive options.  2 days of testing lost. Shall restart.
>> 
>> 
>>> Pinging severs whilst running Netalyzr has no effect.
>> 
>> 	Not being a native english speaker cloud you be more explicit, please. Was the ping RTT affected by the concurrent netalyzr run (especially up- and download testing)? Did you get netsurf-wrapper to work on ubuntu? 
> 
> You did not understand because I explained what I did, and I did the wrong thing.
> 
> Not done properly. Will retry. Netsurf-wrapper will not compile. I am going to move to a more recent version of Ubuntu.
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> The tone buckets of the phone signal are translated into ATM packets by the DSP in the 2 Wire 2700. I have no idea what this closed source BSD implementation does to the packets before they are sent to CeroWRT.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> I am using 3.10.2-1, as I cannot get the latest version to install with sys upgrade.
> 
> I was trying 3.10.5-1 
> 
> DT has taken to stealth with his releases.
> 
>> 
>> 	So 3.10.6-1 fails with sysupgrade?
>> 
>> best
>> 	Sebastian
>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>> 
>