From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C82F21F190 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 02:44:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from u-081-c028.eap.uni-tuebingen.de ([134.2.81.28]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LqylH-1VAoqe1R91-00efyT for ; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:44:43 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:44:47 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Dave Taht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:2eZ79jPAfvN5ocNxts8jIOXrXqZC+jEK2yiYZK3aik+X08c/Uf8 HShzNXLXfs+N7rMARrS6Y7Cp2z4DlaV9PCLSNcNfSC67IEp9MT/JweV2DqFW1UkvCORyLCX PhEJnn5OAOD58rNZQv99tBEs5W/HIM6UbS68o9BijUCe2CPjH8q25yOFWuqxJmQqLNF2xDI 8iyg9sK8f5GbIkpkTy14g== Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.21-1 development release X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 10:44:47 -0000 Hi Dave, On Dec 2, 2013, at 02:07 , Dave Taht wrote: > This is nothing more than a resync with openwrt and a bugfix for > dnsmasq. It is completely untested. >=20 > + fresh merge with openwrt > ++ bunch of ath9k fixes > + update to dnsmasq 2.68rc4 (fixes cname and a few other bugs) >=20 > - haven't found time to address http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/436 > plan to update the machine involved to this version. > hope to get more reports from the field. ? Would like to find = someone > with comcast ipv6 to try this on.... >=20 > - the /sbin/mount bug explanation sounded plausible but haven't tried = it > will do so shortly The quickest test should be to deinstall mount-utils before = running sys upgrade (as far as I know mount-utils is the source of the = incompatible mount binary). The new cerowrt will automatically bring in = its already installed mount-utils, so everything should work after the = upgrade. I have not tested this yet, but I assume this is what I'll try = the next time :)=20 BTW, what is the reason we need mount-utils in the first place, = or what is the busy box mount command missing? best regards sebastian >=20 > - have several reports of a successful "fragmentation?" crash attack > in openwrt in general, but no details. >=20 > I'm taking a bunch of machines into the lab thursday and hope to work > on the latter problem while putting several new machines/OSes through > their paces... It seemes likely I will do another build between now > and thursday. >=20 > In short, not a lot of reason to try this release. Feel free to keep > digesting your turkey. >=20 > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DW5_8U4j51lI >=20 > New version of pie should get dropped next week. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Dave T=E4ht >=20 > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: = http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel