From: Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
To: Neil Davies <neil.davies@pnsol.com>
Cc: cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] Check out www.speedof.me - no Flash
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:46:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C2ABEC02-C834-4D69-8CCD-45D240077ABD@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A4232C7E-E56F-41E7-A846-EA2A89A7F77D@pnsol.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2834 bytes --]
Hi Neil,
> I have a deep worry over this style of single point measurement - and hence speed - as an appropriate measure. We know, and have evidence, that throughput/utilisation is not a good proxy for the network delivering suitable quality of experience. We work with organisation (Telco’s, large system integrators etc) where we spend a lot of time having to “undo” the consequences of “maximising speed”. Just like there is more to life than work, there is more to QoE than speed.
I completely agree with this: those of us who have spent the time to ponder the physics of the problem have come to understand it in its full glory (and complexity). We know that a single number ain't the answer.
But one of my other goals is to increase the awareness of the bufferbloat problem. People *do* use these speed test services, despite their inaccuracy. If those sites could include some form of measurement about the latency (and its change) under load, it makes it easier to describe the problem to others.
The long-term solution is, of course, to get router vendors to realize there's a problem and then respond to market pressures to fix it. I gained a lot of insight from http://apenwarr.ca/log/?m=201407#11 - it has a description of the difficult economic justification for selling a "good router". But where that author was trying to start a company, we're in a different position.
Good latency info in a popular speed test website elevates its importance to the general public. It moves you out of the "nutcase" category ("What's this bufferbloat stuff this guy's talking about?"), into a concerned customer who's offering a useful observation. And it gives credibility when you bug providers. Examples:
- A lot of people reflexively check speedtest.net when they check into a hotel, and then post/tweet the results. If the results include min/max latency, then they can begin to comment to the hotel (where they may even have been charged for the service) when things aren't good.
- I frequently ride a bus to Boston that offers free wifi. I already know they're badly bloated (>20 seconds(!)). With a tool like this, it's easier to begin a conversation with the operations people that lets them put pressure on their own router vendor.
- Home and commercial users can use these values to tell their ISPs that there's a problem, and the expense of fielding those support calls provides some incentive to address the problem.
- Heaven forbid one vendor/provider snatch up the idea and tout it as a competitive advantage... :-)
We've shown that there is a straightforward fix to the problem. With increased awareness from their customers, I hold out hope that we can begin to change the world.
</utopian rant>
Best,
Rich
PS Thanks to Sebastian for the comments, and Martin for those links.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3781 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 496 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-25 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-20 13:19 [Cerowrt-devel] " Rich Brown
2014-07-20 13:27 ` David P. Reed
2014-07-20 18:41 ` [Cerowrt-devel] SIMET: nationwide bw/latency/jitter test effort in Brazil Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-23 5:36 ` [Cerowrt-devel] Check out www.speedof.me - no Flash Alex Elsayed
2014-07-25 9:10 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Neil Davies
2014-07-25 12:09 ` Rich Brown
2014-07-25 12:24 ` Neil Davies
2014-07-25 14:17 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-25 14:25 ` Martin Geddes
2014-07-25 15:58 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-25 16:32 ` Martin Geddes
2014-07-25 17:12 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-25 17:14 ` Neil Davies
2014-07-25 17:17 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-25 17:29 ` Martin Geddes
2014-07-25 21:13 ` David Lang
2014-07-25 22:17 ` dpreed
2014-07-25 23:26 ` David Lang
2014-07-26 13:02 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-26 20:53 ` David Lang
2014-07-26 22:00 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-26 22:30 ` David Lang
2014-07-26 23:14 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-26 20:16 ` Neil Davies
2014-07-25 14:27 ` Neil Davies
2014-07-25 16:02 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-25 21:20 ` David Lang
2014-07-25 22:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-07-25 23:30 ` David Lang
2014-07-26 12:53 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-25 15:05 ` David P. Reed
2014-07-25 15:46 ` Rich Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C2ABEC02-C834-4D69-8CCD-45D240077ABD@gmail.com \
--to=richb.hanover@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=neil.davies@pnsol.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox