From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qa0-x234.google.com (mail-qa0-x234.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::234])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAE0B21F311;
	Wed,  7 May 2014 06:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id cm18so983258qab.39
	for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 07 May 2014 06:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date
	:to:mime-version;
	bh=MmPa3VAca+6KCzGmjQvy8weAF8dl7+vZYYkec5bFLCQ=;
	b=G1a7rbnWCkmJZSS/QtUqJyTY9kpdwiC4iUQ3hkgpdZ/jBUUyjY510vULJKt8IbmPcP
	TGSRedMQLlSte8sHe5N01iQaAKFerhBYP4WOmjkB9lWEpft43X61cvOOb03xlBeA4COz
	RmPzHWYIatUg0f+2NqpoGZR37wfavEIiquJid2C7R1/n4SP6XM060PPkeCpN/Gu2WCYP
	FKqAlqYu8DF/rLsyhaFdHBrv3PA1EppuCzrdLXjD2Ju9leqTLx2LbStNoGSa64oSNVkx
	H0v/O5+uhFB7a+xKjSTM05hfQuEOgiXsrKsN1RLYN3YiFvbHqgEO+Bw28QJ5fIiJn9Gx
	9mhg==
X-Received: by 10.140.41.209 with SMTP id z75mr29082244qgz.107.1399468859381; 
	Wed, 07 May 2014 06:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from richs-mbp-4431.home.lan ([72.95.88.139])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k9sm29204843qat.18.2014.05.07.06.20.56
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Wed, 07 May 2014 06:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C35689EB-E4E9-4ECB-AD2A-11399D06AD82@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 09:20:51 -0400
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Cisco article about Bufferbloat
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 13:21:01 -0000

Cisco posted a note re: Bufferbloat and their PIE algorithm the other =
day.=20

I added a comment that gives a little more background about the history =
of the problem, and acknowledges the work from the Bufferbloat project =
team, kernel developers, and other industry players to produce a good =
result.

Read both at: =
http://newsroom.cisco.com/feature-content?type=3Dwebcontent&articleId=3D14=
14442

Rich=