* [Cerowrt-devel] Cisco article about Bufferbloat
@ 2014-05-07 13:20 Rich Brown
2014-05-08 10:17 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rich Brown @ 2014-05-07 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bloat, cerowrt-devel
Cisco posted a note re: Bufferbloat and their PIE algorithm the other day.
I added a comment that gives a little more background about the history of the problem, and acknowledges the work from the Bufferbloat project team, kernel developers, and other industry players to produce a good result.
Read both at: http://newsroom.cisco.com/feature-content?type=webcontent&articleId=1414442
Rich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] Cisco article about Bufferbloat
2014-05-07 13:20 [Cerowrt-devel] Cisco article about Bufferbloat Rich Brown
@ 2014-05-08 10:17 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-08 12:50 ` Rich Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer @ 2014-05-08 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rich Brown; +Cc: cerowrt-devel, bloat
On Wed, 7 May 2014 09:20:51 -0400
Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com> wrote:
> Cisco posted a note re: Bufferbloat and their PIE algorithm the other day.
>
> I added a comment that gives a little more background about the history
> of the problem, and acknowledges the work from the Bufferbloat project
> team, kernel developers, and other industry players to produce a good
> result.
>
> Read both at: http://newsroom.cisco.com/feature-content?type=webcontent&articleId=1414442
Thank you Rich, for adding that comment. I appreciate Cisco taking
bufferbloat seriously, but the article were a little too Cisco biased
towards who "invented" this stuff.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] Cisco article about Bufferbloat
2014-05-08 10:17 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
@ 2014-05-08 12:50 ` Rich Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rich Brown @ 2014-05-08 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer; +Cc: cerowrt-devel, bloat
Thanks, Jesper,
On May 8, 2014, at 6:17 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 May 2014 09:20:51 -0400
> Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Cisco posted a note re: Bufferbloat and their PIE algorithm the other day.
>>
>> I added a comment that gives a little more background about the history
>> of the problem, and acknowledges the work from the Bufferbloat project
>> team, kernel developers, and other industry players to produce a good
>> result.
>>
>> Read both at: http://newsroom.cisco.com/feature-content?type=webcontent&articleId=1414442
>
> Thank you Rich, for adding that comment. I appreciate Cisco taking
> bufferbloat seriously, but the article were a little too Cisco biased
> towards who "invented" this stuff.
I can't fault Cisco for the article - they publish what suits their purposes. At least they mentioned Bufferbloat, unlike other vendors...
There's a bit of a discussion starting up on that page.
Best,
Rich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-08 12:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-07 13:20 [Cerowrt-devel] Cisco article about Bufferbloat Rich Brown
2014-05-08 10:17 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-08 12:50 ` Rich Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox