From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E08AE21F881 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 14:04:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hms-beagle-7.home.lan ([217.237.70.193]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LtUHA-1YyaOq34KK-010y5d; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 23:04:17 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 23:04:19 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: =?windows-1252?Q?Dave_T=E4ht?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:x1npWfXjXHNNoOmYS7gvw20V4nNqZ/uvGW4i1ESR0sAw+5BLBZn buRH7qyky1mwWICwkzT1bLA/KxMq/cGj0lbP5QRnrGarDSI3P/5RN+aGEYvD2PnzhFYqF2f u/NnzzfWQHr7A8c4u6i8DPRcVUNg+59uhk/sxUAztJs7VnStSfeeEFKv/IMAFyNYBGZ7mnu KrhlQfQQvuPiF4MtBVkQg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:zBNzyIO6Pjs=:HgsFOR7Wgd092SFhUfqt/v 7wXla4c+3+uJY1yd54HWHq0kiayEoLsoLZDY9FUGvXnDA7fcNdSbpiT+Wuq1TJnv3ebnDNQ2b ieiuVsJTPlaHPZwfgZJwXQrGruN3SblR7+DKkobmqWA8ABCLw8R+kgI120yrhr+aXh8Ie5iOC SiI3ozall4WqSPuuVrkTSqkOGLhE/EDXmzOynqq+8hsEHtpucqVLYW/g5GBhS1serqiZXUZfS qeTvjXuhJO9eqiqWxPiDOwd7f8GkGFjs2h8hFyxuRF0X+qfiaT9sKOWQrIqaPlYcefEPGklNO b5VnvJ5vLHwcGkfDvh3W2zyx7Y2RPd5qMzej0FMdYTO9+CAFF3dHe2xU5enX5dnSoUW1Wo65o 1dSDT0sn/1xTHl4k8s4Qjh0x8z1SR36v6XJI+O+vrU9CDkr7q3uMy6pgERp8pMYVijJVnCRYF KQXm/3nsQ6zVmBjAaLgOt06YAulqG5n9ULifP8TZC+5F0RZ5GO+oY1LO3IYiJn6GwJJ2nEob3 3MMAXTr07xbq2e/z45WdOjw/d6fzkJzHzC80uUGuKsby0pmKrjaB/J1zU0Q+e0fbMwlpWyGaU gFOL7FL0bVgMHs9hGpnvXE/0W7afISVt32ATY+sxM6wswN+Dok8x7lT5eArVitTV2RiY7xtU+ CIJ9FEd3xRlml4MFPVJoGjEVvGyG1yGSD9vYl7biGVBM9l5JyUVUgm9uezoJZOErVG74= Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Any chance for the LUCI GUI for cake appearing? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 21:04:50 -0000 On Jun 26, 2015, at 21:48 , Dave Taht wrote: > It turns out that I am pulling from openwrt for luci-app-sqm, not > ceropackages, and overriding it was a headache. Fixed now, see below >=20 > router# cd /tmp; wget > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/luci-app-sqm_3-5_all.ipk ; > opkg install ./luci-app-sqm_3-5_all.ipk > router # /etc/init.d/uhttpd restart >=20 > if it breaks, you get to keep both pieces, but it worked for me, and > yea! cake in the gui! thx sebastian! Too cite Shaggy =93Wasn=92t me=94 ;); the initial commit was not = mine and I do not want to claim otherwise. I basically just rearranged = the "deck-chairs" as I tend to think. I seem to be better at the =93 = love for details=94 thing than the=94big picture=94, anyways Best Regards Sebastian >=20 >=20 > I tried - >=20 > ./scripts feeds uninstall luci-app-sqm; ./scripts feeds install -p > cero luci-app-sqm # seemed sane, did not work > git rm in the feed itself did not work > doing the uninstall, deleting the symlink, and the git rm, nuking the > bin/ar71xx/packages/packages/luci-app-sqm* > and doing a complete rebuild... eventually did work... but strikes me > as a bit more brute force than I wanted. >=20 > I am not in a position (aformentioned build is my specialized for > pico/nano build at the moment) to update the packages db, > but I stuck up the correct new package... which you can install via >=20 >=20 > Apologies for the confusion, I simply figured that the -p option would > work, and never checked. >=20 > I also note that I think I am building things compile tuned for the > archer mips34c, rather thanthe wndr3800=B4s 24c. However I kept the > unaligned access hacks (not needed on the 34c derived archer, but > needed on the 24c wndr3800) >=20 > Sigh. >=20 > maintaining 3 separate trees for the platforms we sort of support is a > PITA. Then adding in something that can mesh by default on 2 others. > and then trying to get anything to compile for another arch entirely > and failing... >=20 >=20 > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Sebastian Moeller = wrote: >> Hi Jim, >>=20 >>=20 >> On Jun 26, 2015, at 19:21 , Jim Gettys wrote: >>=20 >>> Inquiring minds would like to know=85. >>=20 >> I guess, that depends on your definition of =93LUCI GUI for = cake=94; as far as I know you can select cake in the =93Queueing = Discipline=94 drop down in the =93Queue Discipline=94 tab of = luci-app-sqm. So if the machine has the cake module and a sufficiently = recent (out-of-tree) tc binary installed it should just work. Using the = =93Advanced option strings=85=94 it even should be possible to pass = arbitrary strings to cake (without any error checking), so I assume we = are all set up for cake testing (or should that be cake tasting?) from = the LUCI GUI. But I have not managed to build cake locally, nor have I = dared to risk my families internet connectivity by trying one of Dave=92s = newer "openwrt trunk with cake=94 builds. So these changes linger in the = ceropackages-3.10 repository until we get enough tasting to convince = Toke to pull them into the openwrt repositories (these changes affect = both sqm-scripts and luci-app-sqm). Dave graciously allowed me access to = one of his test machines, and the changes allow to set up cake from the = GUI, but I only did limited functionality testing. (And we discovered = that something was of in that cake worked but did not accept all the = keywords it should have, but unless you are on a XDSL-Link you most = likely do not care about specifying per-packet-overhead) >> If you have any specific thing you are missing, let me know = and I will try to help. >>=20 >> Best Regards >> Sebastian >>=20 >>=20 >>> - Jim >>>=20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Dave T=E4ht > worldwide bufferbloat report: > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat > And: > What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? > https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast