From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <moeller0@gmx.de>
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "mout.gmx.net",
	Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 546FC21F27E
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hms-beagle.home.lan ([87.164.165.7]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101)
	with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LnkiR-1Z97EG1xqZ-00hwzC;
	Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:09:43 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <48350C2E-C33A-4534-84BC-5D56F4AAF0EA@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:09:41 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C8112FE8-00FB-4B03-A929-E2A426A7FD34@gmx.de>
References: <CAA93jw40JoJLZK_=c14v7OdZrnUJrkvzk=-hxYKP0QT=T=5i0Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<08BAF198-87C5-42B8-8899-53F34E47156E@gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1503221844590.22474@nftneq.ynat.uz>
	<D10FD962-461E-43DF-A45E-C4EAF8630685@gmail.com>
	<896FAE61-B45A-4F34-9449-5ADB82194DD9@gmx.de>
	<48350C2E-C33A-4534-84BC-5D56F4AAF0EA@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:y7XJzkM6GZPzHCCuAiPey7MdMuq9PCnK1tGIuomUAaafJsjJeRE
	bB//mUF5zdBj9WvAOG1Vmm6NDBNnZ8lzm5QgCBlxAVH8x1+s0BTZXz65yD11t6OA7034Dd9
	alNO48cCg3AIDqbRDY3YCGaM39yKvnm0Kl2OhlLsWS+TrtOZUDxfvBB1h76j7N1567RUwTY
	sX905cNhlBECQOuE7ARmg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] archer c7 v2, policing, hostapd,
	test openwrt build
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:10:23 -0000

Hi Jonathan,

On Mar 23, 2015, at 14:43 , Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> =
wrote:

>=20
>> On 23 Mar, 2015, at 08:09, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
>>=20
>> It obviously degrade local performance of se00 and hence be not a =
true solution unless one is happy to fully dedicate a box as shaper ;)
>=20
> Dedicating a box as a router/shaper isn=92t so much of a problem, but =
shaping traffic between wired and wireless - and sharing the incoming =
WAN bandwidth between them, too - is.  outer

	Exactly the sentiment I had, but less terse and actually =
understandable ;)

> It=92s a valid test, though, for this particular purpose.

	Once I get around to test it, I should b able to share some =
numbers=85

Best Regards
	Sebastian

>=20
> - Jonathan Morton
>=20