From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68EA021FB59 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 10:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hms-beagle-7.home.lan ([217.237.70.193]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M96Jd-1ZLakR3QWT-00CQgd; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 19:04:27 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 19:04:20 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <43D5C3CE-F1F4-4BA5-AEB9-55348661C7BA@gmx.de> <8B853F1C-DE5D-4F3D-88CC-CB8DA2D3E8B1@gmx.de> To: Mikael Abrahamsson , =?windows-1252?Q?Toke_H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ZKS7uiCygBMiLPOO/0CoAvj20+d42vp0MJMWu4Eipz9TUySkcE1 R5iEFE2NZH3PFv2RqE1zExRIMl/9xzxHFDtQVJiY4DYHFrshM14U/yQjcpv0Og5OOh3j6fK Kb6On1oR2cvOTKmni3GspJE7ttE4cQpAeR3cDfhcMkALni9nj7+Rf+bMphahjlI7mPZD00p tqgDK0Pkiur2ZYf8379lg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Y+lX78Iix2g=:fRkCXwqWsQTfOL6A5If45h FMWA1m5kHiJJCewfsbf/qAsGA+44AFhTDKnyQlOi1vRmLniw9XG8O+m7iTc9NpAw187nQm3aQ G3CgKtJ4Ejcs5CtDv1PsPUfSGnOojQUrUrK+/dRD9SMFHmWMY4qQ/E/PtdXDgPns7aWrDH4ZT ZKsjLsEaYvAIIAzZ8dJ2n2w5t3zIGKi0ns8nth6NF0qZEZpbkr09VgrdhfXUTyqfEpuquutov 1uk2eYdFwlymBjXtPanidZkExWdwrcYxUMq+bxPSNnnYJavHdSvtKzAlsgKYQZAJlBfxrp22y wMXFbk0J3QtfXKiyG1WmOcVmUVrSWmNGeEIkN4A6z62/10izS314gMfxbbeCVx+mycs25mC1Z 6fWQDvXVFzq/q/VilQ84o8ibjMfqie6tZSsDvFFpCnP+S2eKhhaiPMquZJbOJRjtk0J2ly4hX cfrk/ysoL/rf+kacSgqPs5scHBRdCrv3xp5B6tmq/CnRUe1zbP4rp3aV33/3MBGkHuJZtsSCR mgS1p6PS9O8ZngE0GW91j3sSlAIP6MESyGHUySA83OmLutqwLmqGfBolmOsQP1NsYTh2qjvel CRdFJ0uofP8CpAf2iOiyLoAGHyx59ur14iUQ/OGaVHjhgQLls1MJ+9THqiWw1NM8TyrZAMHMm 6sMl9+v1qsdUMvG/qBiOh1P4AOOWefnQTiBDEfRmE9nDe+Y/ftdqIQeXew4H3DsnlqKg= Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 17:04:59 -0000 Hi Mikael, On Jun 28, 2015, at 12:29 , Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, Sebastian Moeller wrote: >=20 >> Ah, I see the latest changes have not yet made it into the = openwrt repository (due to lack of testing). As I do not have = permissions/authority to push changes into the openwrt repository, there = is nothing I can do to expedite the process. You could replace = /usr/lib/lua/luci/model/cbi/sqm.lua on your router with the following = (attached file) >=20 > Ok, I have done that, run a battery of tests both at 50/50 and 500/500 = with cake. >=20 > http://swm.pp.se/aqm/wrt1200ac-flent-cake-150628-1.tar This looks great, could you by any chance confirm that the GUI = does allow to configure cake and that you can or can not set the = overhead for cake in the link layer adjustments (LLA) tab? (select cake = as link layer adjustment method, and put 42 into the overhead field and = report the output of =93tc -d qdisc=94 before and after selecting cake = as LLA). @Toke: If that works, I think we can safely push these changes = into the openwrt repositories... Best Regards Sebastian >=20 > --=20 > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se