From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com (mail-oi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A71B21F623 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:16:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by oigb199 with SMTP id b199so61001125oig.3 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:16:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=eO+mBsuYusU/ZQsTYStXJ5hKdNLwxSzxjOmlOs3FhQM=; b=G9DR3A2yysd6BpxLhpvasb4KXV42YfJKO/RkxPuZ9KdKP/67mxbHQTpFY6tRObQaWz LYDUcmCciL3GNfkAv9v3MERjwq4HzKXR8gxi1plzetzK9XRFTqbO6Zv3A/Os9sC8g1+q MqUMDB7o8kC77rfbJ7vHF69zADBCpTbVW2hdTL83yVe3g3Q5RRGfv8uftuSlhp4tBUGt bk8Dj2NBCuCF2J3pCtc4NwZ1WPUmOc8Pzq9xtjvW1+VoovF5gUy+JxpZHb49nTSekl+t o8t/+Mx3i5YtHZdurYaXPdr2HfPbZekoqh8daCFlraiLW/x1rZDGdP/zF237BRQmpGSS JyQw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.214.37 with SMTP id nx5mr40717054obc.56.1435263363159; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:16:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.105.129 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:16:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <26463A88-821B-44B7-A728-64BCB0B7C7BB@gmx.de> <55847E32.9000405@gmail.com> <5584823E.4040207@gmail.com> <0129B5FB-9D1B-45FF-84CA-492A6A0B638B@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:16:03 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Mikael Abrahamsson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 20:16:32 -0000 Did you restart sqm after turning off offloads? maxpacket is accumulative and wont change back otherwise.