From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x22b.google.com (mail-ob0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E454421F14B for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:37:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id va2so19762716obc.2 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:37:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WivGJO4kDzTanUe4QURjkrQzPZV6rLxiy/mn4Q/h2Zk=; b=Oqi+7q/EsIthtM42XJBBPS07637jzVKHAb8rS5skN1sGv+AmVAg+Iu8TaNu87Lacta GG1K1k48CPnxbkRzmXviTdlXs0NdxNXrtBxv2JHwI9+EDzCVYbxVnpSFtONAFkkiV/3X JlnnAO9+hUji71PqGmHSh2+9me7k1XfDIKxr+LpzVy/904bLkPnx6FQYvEl22jLjkZTS nhN2LH53nMhymKGS711TZkTrZqaaDdZ9444jW/IX9VOZMHTFsW9MCo6+LWICkWWdMdOq 4dAKg14m/VVGBzdKiFpu829YwJrFStEssMbQebmcyj10ndW687PU/VULcPfoPbQPXQtH AFZw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.111.131 with SMTP id v3mr17620768oik.133.1421685477274; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:37:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.51.66 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:37:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <63C60796-0C39-474C-B5A4-F2FCACC4592A@gmx.de> References: <63C60796-0C39-474C-B5A4-F2FCACC4592A@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:37:57 -0800 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Sebastian Moeller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] another contender for WNDR replacement X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:38:27 -0000 oh, they are using a nice ethernet chip from intel? That will help. I did feel the apu1c was improvable, but the intel "dma to cache" since ivy bridge feature is a tremendous advantage for intel chips. Sigh, more benchmarking.... On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > Hi List, > the following might just be what we need to replace the WNDR as a hig(er)= -speed capable traffic shaper: > > http://www.fit-pc.com/web/products/specifications/fitlet-models-specifica= tions/?model%5B%5D=3Dfitlet-B+%28TBA%29&model%5B%5D=3Dfitlet-X+%28TBA%29&mo= del%5B%5D=3Dfitlet-i+%28TBA%29 > > The entry level model fitlet-B is estimated at $129 (requires ram and msa= ta), no information about the more interesting fitlet-i (2 GE ports). The A= MD Jaguar SoC is supposedly more powerfull then the AMD G series T40E in th= e pc-engines api-1d ( http://www.pcengines.ch/apu1d.htm ) that was not that= hot network wise ( http://planet.ipfire.org/post/pc-engines-apu1c-a-review= ). Improvements include twice the L2, slightly faster DRAM, slightly tweak= ed core, an potentially =E2=80=9Cturbo=E2=80=9D up to 1.6Ghz from 1GHz base= , intel GE chip i211 with BQL support. Downside the intel AC wifi card most= likely will not allow proper tweaking (so maybe not suited for the make-wi= fi-fast project) > So most likely this thing will also not be able to do SQM/Cake at= 300Mbps combined or better. Would it not be sweet to finally be able to = =E2=80=9Cretire=E2=80=9D the wndrs=E2=80=A6 > > Best Regards > Sebastian > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks