From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Full blown DNSSEC by default?
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 21:26:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw41jCuc2UN0rB6WQdVz2qzOtEcoCS-Pm6czwLDU59uXqA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
I am delighted that we have the capability now to do dnssec.
I am not surprised that various domain name holders are doing it
wrong, nor that some ISPs and registrars don't support doing it
either. We are first past the post here, and kind of have to expect
some bugs...
but is the overall sense here:
A) we should do full dnssec by default, and encourage users to use
open dns resolvers like google dns that support it when their ISPs
don't?
B) or should we fall back to the previous partial dnssec
implementation that didn't break as hard, and encourage folk to turn
it up full blast if supported correctly by the upstream ISP?
C) or come up with a way of detecting a broken upstream and falling
back to a public open resolver?
Is there a "D"?
--
Dave Täht
NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article
next reply other threads:[~2014-04-13 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-13 4:26 Dave Taht [this message]
2014-04-13 7:51 ` Török Edwin
2014-04-13 15:04 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-13 10:05 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-04-13 14:57 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-13 17:59 ` Chuck Anderson
2014-04-13 23:24 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-14 9:29 ` Aaron Wood
2014-04-17 21:01 ` Simon Kelley
2014-04-17 21:19 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-20 14:01 ` Chuck Anderson
2014-04-20 15:16 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-04-20 15:41 ` Chuck Anderson
2014-04-13 16:16 ` dpreed
2014-04-13 16:40 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-13 17:57 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw41jCuc2UN0rB6WQdVz2qzOtEcoCS-Pm6czwLDU59uXqA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox