From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-x229.google.com (mail-ig0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB57521F100 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 09:18:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ig0-f169.google.com with SMTP id uq10so7604517igb.0 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 09:18:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CEJwviy1wte5jcFqO2RoKUUMuuvtFB+SmC5gFNl5pzY=; b=ePkg+X+TsQxzu+wi2bni7wbOlq+aUZ7J43kb/OoPSde9AJJRPdJq1CGoAPXInvJH++ AizLE3sbEWmjWlFHe0rnSGkg2c9+Dckd8u4K8dWVIFgVQo4CeLDM6I7FcP5ShJVfHKbT NrBvosH64QULXATTyleQygZ18Q3LFWTdOOPQXaukKilTuktkOKuUXr2d81z7mIXCXjJG CVvHi2lLd7d3V+hxhbr4norKEnSeztxlkQrnVHJndhR1z7o7fpMrDO1MyUCZnOKa+COV xwKs4QvKAvjcsVxIy/omjW0yepHA1rdsnhFxA9G+PPsnTrWvKWLQ4mgPMZNlCy1miuB/ J5AQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.154.102 with SMTP id vn6mr10058583igb.1.1390670327175; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 09:18:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.145.67 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 09:18:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87d2jgat4c.fsf@toke.dk> References: <87d2jgat4c.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:18:47 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland=2DJ=F8rgensen?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] procd support for core daemons? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 17:18:48 -0000 On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Toke H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen = wrote: > Dave Taht writes: > >> Well, when I get back to california I have ipv6 capability again so >> I'll add tincd to my testlist of the vpn technologies that may be >> problematic with source/dst routing... > > Right. Pretty sure it doesn't work if you use the built-in routing > stuff. I just run it in layer2 switch mode, though, and run babeld on > top of that. Haven't gotten around to upgrading to the source routing > version yet, though... I note that this is the babels branch of babel, not the babel-rtt branch, which has implications for your routing metrics. > > -Toke --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html