From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Brandon Butterworth <brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk>
Cc: bufferbloat-fcc-discuss
<bufferbloat-fcc-discuss@lists.redbarn.org>,
"cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [bufferbloat-fcc-discuss] the real future of the internet starts with fixing todays internet
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 07:28:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4=+2eZYLwJVQRX0LYEXV_uK513BGfk4P7R-2ROgosmqg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201604090904.KAA11572@sunf10.rd.bbc.co.uk>
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Brandon Butterworth
<brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>> there is quite serious money with the label "Next Generation Internet"
>> attached to it. At least 750 million euro, waiting to be put to good
>> use. Typically the EC expect a consultation like this to yield maybe
>> 50-100 responses, mostly from its usual suspects
>
> The usual suspects have it sewn up. We do a lot of EU funded work but
> on Future Internet it was mostly spent by a few large telcos and
> nothing useful came of it, we gave up as we were getting nowhere (was
> costing us more in effort we could just use to do the work ourselves)
Well, say that to them, not to me!
>> two decades and billions of Euro's of failed
>> funding have shown that the regular way of working with huge consortia
>> and projects working on fashionable 'innovations' has brought nothing
>> that stuck.
>
> They did try breaking out of that, reality is they don't get to decide
> what the future is and would be better giving the money to many smaller
> projects to stir up the pool it may evolve out of.
Exactly!
...
For a goodly portion of my life I've been working off of a superset of
http://the-edge.taht.net/post/gilmores_list/
>
> brandon
parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-09 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <201604090904.KAA11572@sunf10.rd.bbc.co.uk>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAA93jw4=+2eZYLwJVQRX0LYEXV_uK513BGfk4P7R-2ROgosmqg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk \
--cc=bufferbloat-fcc-discuss@lists.redbarn.org \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox