Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Brandon Butterworth <brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk>
Cc: bufferbloat-fcc-discuss
	<bufferbloat-fcc-discuss@lists.redbarn.org>,
	 "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [bufferbloat-fcc-discuss] the real future of the internet starts with fixing todays internet
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 07:28:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4=+2eZYLwJVQRX0LYEXV_uK513BGfk4P7R-2ROgosmqg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201604090904.KAA11572@sunf10.rd.bbc.co.uk>

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Brandon Butterworth
<brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>> there is quite serious money with the label "Next Generation Internet"
>> attached to it. At least 750 million euro, waiting to be put to good
>> use. Typically the EC expect a consultation like this to yield maybe
>> 50-100 responses, mostly from its usual suspects
>
> The usual suspects have it sewn up. We do a lot of EU funded work but
> on Future Internet it was mostly spent by a few large telcos and
> nothing useful came of it, we gave up as we were getting nowhere (was
> costing us more in effort we could just use to do the work ourselves)

Well, say that to them, not to me!

>> two decades and billions of Euro's of failed
>> funding have shown that the regular way of working with huge consortia
>> and projects working on fashionable 'innovations' has brought nothing
>> that stuck.
>
> They did try breaking out of that, reality is they don't get to decide
> what the future is and would be better giving the money to many smaller
> projects to stir up the pool it may evolve out of.

Exactly!

...

For a goodly portion of my life I've been working off of a superset of

http://the-edge.taht.net/post/gilmores_list/


>
> brandon

           reply	other threads:[~2016-04-09 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <201604090904.KAA11572@sunf10.rd.bbc.co.uk>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw4=+2eZYLwJVQRX0LYEXV_uK513BGfk4P7R-2ROgosmqg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk \
    --cc=bufferbloat-fcc-discuss@lists.redbarn.org \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox