Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] did a chaos calmer openwrt build, untested
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 09:58:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4EbA2C0O_1wUFrA8gvvPK1+eit+=XFWpTWHG+M4J8dxw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1380 bytes --]

I folded in the following:

  * minstrel-blues
  * minstrel patches for minimum variance (hurts udp, helps tcp)
  * babel-1.6.0 release candidate
  * cake and the usual slew of alternate bufferbloat-fighting qdiscs

I intended to use this build to test my ubnt gear and the archer c7v2. It
is NOT cerowrt...

http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/ubnt/ar71xx/

1) But before I even got so far as trying that build, ran across this
ticket.

https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/19194

2) Is the consensus here we should resume using the "device naming by
security model" mode?

3) Things I would like to be developing and then testing
  * latest dnsmasq code (with fixed date getting stuff to hopefully finally
make it up to openwrt)
  * latest FIB patches backported to 3.18 (or, possibly, moving to 4.0)
  * babel with atomic routing updates
  * cake, etc.
  * bobbie (policer)
  * ???

4) Generic problem:

We need some form of autodetection of whether or not IPV6_SUBTREES is
enabled in the kernel (whether in userspace or with additional kernel
support for making the query - perhaps with kernel support) -
presently that is a compile time only option in babel and I'd like it to be
the
default.

-- 
Dave Täht
Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again!

https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1956 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2015-03-16 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-16 16:58 Dave Taht [this message]
     [not found] ` <550711A0.1080706@midlink.org>
2015-03-16 17:30   ` Dave Taht
2015-03-16 18:53 ` Felix Fietkau
2015-03-16 19:19   ` Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw4EbA2C0O_1wUFrA8gvvPK1+eit+=XFWpTWHG+M4J8dxw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox