forking this thread... On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > > > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:32 AM, David Lang wrote: > >> On Sun, 26 May 2013, Lance Hepler wrote: >> >> That's tragic. I just picked up a Netgear WNDR4300 (openbox on sale at >>> the >>> local Fry's) to see if I could hack up a CeroWrt clone on it. It seems to >>> be mostly the same hardware as the WNDR3700v4 and the TP-Link WDR43[01]0, >>> with things just wired up slightly differently. >>> >> >> As I understnad it, the difference between the WNDR3700v4 and WNDR4300 is >> that the 4300 has a slightly better wireless chip. >> >> Unfortunantly from what I've seen so far, they did something wierd with >> the storage and as a result the stock openwrt can't access it. I've seen >> reports of people getting it to run from an initramfs, but this means that >> no settings can be preserved across reboot. >> >> If you've seen anything different, I'd be very interested to hear about >> it (I picked up a 3700v4 and a couple 4300's for testing) >> > > according to a birdie, "it looks like it's an ONFI with quirks, or nobody > has realised that it's ONFI at all.". Perhaps that's enough clue to get > someone started? but I fear jtag debugging will be needed. Flash chips tend > to have interesting race conditions.... > Same birdie: "Ok, according to http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/nand-data/nanddata.htmlit has a detection bug, that may or may not be significant. So, it's ONFI 1.0 with quirks (part is a *Micron 29F1G08ABADA)" * -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html