From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] WNDR alternative for higher capacity
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 14:45:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4F-HGeu9y8Ft2RFN+F7dCkggkTz6pKp3x3y7oxNjfy4Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mwi18fl5.fsf@toke.dk>
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
> So I've hit the capacity limit for the WNDR3800 for upstream bandwidth:
> http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data/karlstad/rrul-2014-02-08T195914.021795.cerowrt_3_10_26_fresh_boot_no_sqm.png
>
> This is without sqm enabled, even. When I plug in my laptop instead, I
> get a smooth 100Mbps in both directions. So I'm now looking for
> alternatives to act as router. Any suggestions? I'd prefer dual-band,
What you are seeing mostly is the impact of the firewall rules.
Without firewall rules I can get ~330Mbit.
> dual radios; similar to what the WNDR has. And has to be able to run
> OpenWRT, of course; in which case I'll try to get Cerowrt running on it. :)
>
> One possibility is getting something like a zbox:
> http://www.zotac.com/products/mini-pcs/zbox/product/zbox/detail/zbox-id91-1.html
>
> Or a shuttle:
> http://uk.shuttle.com/products/productsSpec?productId=1718
>
> However those might be a bit overkill. Also I can't seem to find any
> info on what wlan card they feature. Does anyone know?
Probably a lousy one.
> -Toke
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
--
Dave Täht
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-08 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-08 21:22 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-02-08 22:45 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2014-02-08 23:22 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-02-08 23:32 ` Fred Stratton
2014-02-09 17:22 ` Bill Merriam
2014-02-09 18:51 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-02-09 19:06 ` Dave Taht
2014-02-09 19:18 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-02-09 19:38 ` Fred Stratton
2014-02-09 19:43 ` Fred Stratton
2014-02-09 19:45 ` Dave Taht
2014-02-09 19:56 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-02-09 20:10 ` Dave Taht
2014-02-10 13:14 ` Rich Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw4F-HGeu9y8Ft2RFN+F7dCkggkTz6pKp3x3y7oxNjfy4Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox